Yes. Just so you know, I'm only in 11th grade, so I might not be using the right vocab, but I'll try my best.
It can be justified the same way that it was during the Korean War. In order to repel communism in South Korea, the US troops were launched. This was a unilateral military action. In the same way that the US used the Monroe Doctrine to help aid and enforce their rule in other places, this is what happened during the Iraqi War. The US saw an unjust system of government reigning unfairly, so they intervened to overthrow it. The justification there was that they should have been able to choose their own government (in short, they should have a fair and free democracy).
<span>Passed by Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified on December 6, 1865, the 13th amendment abolished slavery in the United States and provides that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States</span>
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A: enrolling in different type of school is not very relevant to politics
C: When she decides not to vote "does not make a difference", she didn't participate.
D: moving into other places is not very relevant to politics
Answer:
The U.S. justification for the Iraq War has been widely criticized both within and outside the United States by a range of common and official sources.[Putting this debate aside, the prosecution of the war effort along a number of lines has often been criticized by both supporters and critics of the invasion.
Most notably, the U.S. and its allies have been criticized by opponents for not devoting enough forces to the mission, not preparing sufficiently for post-invasion Iraq, and for encouraging and perpetrating systematic violations of human rights. Critics have also railed against the increased human and financial costs as the battle has continued.
Answer:
A movement for more democracy in American government in the 1830s.
Explanation:
