1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Irina18 [472]
3 years ago
9

Why were nativists in favor of the Chinese exclusion act

History
1 answer:
NeTakaya3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

These legal restrictions reflected nativist claims that:

the Chinese posed multiple threats. They came as servile “coolie” laborers who would take away the livelihood and destroy the dignity of white workingmen. They lived “huddled together…almost like rats” in pestilential ghettos, “Chinatowns” that endangered the health and welfare of the larger white community. Behind the apparently placid demeanor of these Orientals lurked the sexually demonic. The “Chinamen” not only drove their own women into prostitution but also sought to debauch vulnerable white women—or so it seemed in the sexual fantasy of their foes.”

Explanation:

You might be interested in
(Choose ALL that apply)
kotykmax [81]
A and C my dude................

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Chinese require the Portuguese to pay for goods in gold and silver when trading?
kenny6666 [7]

Answer:

The correct answer is A) Portuguese goods were less valuable than Chinese goods

Explanation:

At the time, the Chinese civilization was one of the most advanced in the world. The products they made including silk, ornaments, porcelain etc had a lot of value in countries like Portugal who had a growing income.

However,  Portuguese products were not of very high quality. The Portuguese developed textiles, wooden products and even imported new agriculture products from South America. However, these products were not considered valuable in China.

Hence, Ming China wanted the Portuguese to pay in more valuable for Gold and Silver.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was machiavelli a humanist?
zubka84 [21]

Answer:Machiavelli’s realism

Niccolò Machiavelli, whose work derived from sources as authentically humanistic as those of Ficino, proceeded along a wholly opposite course. A throwback to the chancellor-humanists Salutati, Bruni, and Poggio, he served Florence in a similar capacity and with equal fidelity, using his erudition and eloquence in a civic cause. Like Vittorino and other early humanists, he believed in the centrality of historical studies, and he performed a signally humanistic function by creating, in La mandragola (1518; The Mandrake), the first vernacular imitation of Roman comedy. His unswerving concentration on human weakness and institutional corruption suggests the influence of Boccaccio; and, like Boccaccio, he used these reminders less as topical satire than as practical gauges of human nature. In one way at least, Machiavelli is more humanistic (i.e., closer to the classics) than the other humanists, for while Vittorino and his school ransacked history for examples of virtue, Machiavelli (true to the spirit of Polybius, Livy, Plutarch, and Tacitus) embraced all of history—good, evil, and indifferent—as his school of reality. Like Salutati, though perhaps with greater self-awareness, Machiavelli was ambiguous as to the relative merits of republics and monarchies. In both public and private writings—especially the Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio (1531; Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livy)—he showed a marked preference for republican government, but in The Prince (1532) he developed, with apparent approval, a model of radical autocracy. For this reason, his goals have remained unclear.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4) What document was the result of the need for cooperation between the states?
UkoKoshka [18]
Declaration of Independence

6 0
3 years ago
What was different about president roosevelt's approach to the great depression when compared with president hoover? what did ro
Jlenok [28]
<span>The differences between Herbert Hoover and Franklin Delano Roosevelt's views on economics and social welfare exemplified, to a large extent, the distinctions that have long differentiated conservatives and liberals in the United States.  Hoover's views were representative of those who advocated for the primacy of free enterprise and for a minimal role for the federal government in setting economic policy and regulating business.  He was a firm believer in self-sufficiency and in what is known...</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Minor parties play the "spoiler" role in elections by
    9·1 answer
  • Under Japan's new system of feudalism, the daimyo were
    6·2 answers
  • Which problems led to the decline of Sumer?
    5·2 answers
  • Which best states the function of independent living facilities for people with disabilities?
    6·2 answers
  • Which sentence best explains what needed to happen for the Constitution to take effect? (5 points)
    15·2 answers
  • !!!ANSWER THIS ASAP PLEASE!!!
    15·2 answers
  • Help me please it’s due today
    14·1 answer
  • In Africa traders learned to use the winds created by _______ to help propel their voyages
    13·2 answers
  • Important background information about enslavement
    8·1 answer
  • HURRY I HAVE 20 MIN LEFT What were collcas?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!