Answer:
Choice A)
.
Step-by-step explanation:
What are the changes that would bring
to
?
- Translate
to the left by
unit, and - Stretch
vertically (by a factor greater than
.)
. The choices of
listed here are related to
:
- Choice A)
; - Choice B)
; - Choice C)
; - Choice D)
.
The expression in the braces (for example
as in
) is the independent variable.
To shift a function on a cartesian plane to the left by
units, add
to its independent variable. Think about how
, which is to the left of
, will yield the same function value.
Conversely, to shift a function on a cartesian plane to the right by
units, subtract
from its independent variable.
For example,
is
unit to the left of
. Conversely,
is
unit to the right of
. The new function is to the left of
. Meaning that
should should add
to (rather than subtract
from) the independent variable of
. That rules out choice B) and D).
- Multiplying a function by a number that is greater than one will stretch its graph vertically.
- Multiplying a function by a number that is between zero and one will compress its graph vertically.
- Multiplying a function by a number that is between
and zero will flip its graph about the
-axis. Doing so will also compress the graph vertically. - Multiplying a function by a number that is less than
will flip its graph about the
-axis. Doing so will also stretch the graph vertically.
The graph of
is stretched vertically. However, similarly to the graph of this graph
, the graph of
increases as
increases. In other words, the graph of
isn't flipped about the
-axis.
should have been multiplied by a number that is greater than one. That rules out choice C) and D).
Overall, only choice A) meets the requirements.
Since the plot in the question also came with a couple of gridlines, see if the points
's that are on the graph of
fit into the expression
.
Give a reason for each step of the proof.
Given: <1 and <2 are complimentary
<1 is congruent to <3,
<2 is congruent to <4
Prove: <3 and <4 are complimentary
Statements: Reasons:
1. <1 and <2 are complimentary 1.Given
2. m<1 + m<2=90* 2.<u>DEFINITION OF COMPLEMENTARY ANGLES</u>
3. <1 is congruent to <3, <2 is congruent to <4 3.__GIVEN______
4. m<1=m<3, m<2=m<4 4.<u>DEFINITION OF CONGRUENT ANGLES_</u>
5. m<3 + m<2=90* 5. <u>SUBSTITUTION PROPERTY (m<1 is replaced by m<3.) </u>
6. m<3 +m<4=90* 6. <u>DEFINITION OF COMPLEMENTARY ANGLES </u>
7. <3 and <4 are complimentary 7.<u> DEFINITION OF COMPLEMENTARY ANGLES</u>
Answer:
x = - 1 ± 2i
Step-by-step explanation:
we can use the discriminant b² - 4ac to determine the nature of the roots
• If b² - 4ac > , roots are real and distinct
• If b² - 4ac = 0, roots are real and equal
• If b² - ac < 0, roots are not real
for x² + 2x + 5 = 0
with a = 1, b = 2 and c = 5, then
b² - 4ac = 2² - (4 × 1 × 5 ) = 4 - 20 = - 16
since b² - 4ac < 0 there are 2 complex roots
using the quadratic formula to calculate the roots
x = ( - 2 ±
) / 2
= (- 2 ± 4i ) / 2 = - 1 ± 2i
With the equation:
0.15 x = 30
x = 30 : 0.15 = $200
A regular price of TV is $200.
Which could not be used to determine x ( we shall plug in the value 200 ):
A ) 0.15 * 200 = 200 - 30
30 ≠ 170
B ) 0.85 * 200 = 200 - 30
170 = 170 ( correct )
C ) 200 - 0.15 * 200 = 200 - 30
200 - 30 = 200 - 30
170 = 170 ( correct )
D ) 0.15 * 200 = 30
30 = 30 ( correct )
Answer:
A ) 0.15 x = x - 30
No, this rel. is not proportional because of the addition involved ("plus 1 lb for each guest").
A proportional rel. features mult. only.