I believe it is criminal for the fact it is a local law broken and not written within the constitution, its is not civil for the fact no one is injure or civilly offended, and it is not a military or war law that he broke.
The answer is criminal
The Populist Party was appealing to the farmers because it worked to increase the money supply and get lower interest rates for farmers. This was appealing to farmers facing diverse financing problems including falling prices of crops, running out of farmland, and expensive transportation of goods
The correct answer is C) They saw their lack of any losses as proof that they were destined to control the land.
The warfare between colonists and American Indians during the 17th century generated a sense of superiority among the colonists in that "they saw their lack of any losses as proof that they were destined to control the land."
Without a doubt, the white European colonies had much better weapons than the Native American Indian tribes. The Indians had disadvantages on this issue that affected the results in battles.
This created the wrong impression in the colonists that they were better prepared and deserved the right to control the land and domain the Native American Indians.
This, of course, generated a lot of resentment on the part of the Indians that saw how the white colonizers continued to take their lands to settle in and exploit the raw materials and natural resources.
Answer:
Sixty years ago, Allied political leaders and military commanders at the highest strategic levels fretfully considered the question of when the war in Europe would end and what that end would look like. Guessing would not be useful, and hopes could not be blind. The coming of the end of the war needed to be a matter of educated assessment, flexible planning and unprecedented coordination within government and the armed services.
Fortunately, Winston Spencer Churchill proved to be a master at meeting all of those demands. Britain’s prime minister had an uncanny ability to anticipate the course of events and to encourage or admonish as necessary. Above all, Churchill clearly foresaw the end of war in Europe. He showed such sound judgment, in fact, that one could say his predictions make a handsome bookend to his other, long-recognized predictions in the 1930s about the coming of the war. First as min-ister of defense and later as prime minister and a key member of a multinational coalition, Churchill masterfully managed the situation and never lost his faith in the war’s eventual outcome. He was also brilliantly adept at preparing his nation and its allies for the problems that they would face when peace finally did return.
Explanation:
