Answer:
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
An increase in the size of tax is likely to increase the tax revenue when the price elasticity of supply, as well as price elasticity of demand, are both large.
The imposition of tax will cause an increase in the price of the product. If the price elasticity of demand is higher, an increase in the price will lead to a more than proportionate decrease in demand.
At the same time, high price elasticity of supply means that when the tax is imposed the sellers will be able to reduce quantity more easily.
So when less output is produced and demanded the tax revenue will also be lower.
Answer:
the government-expenditure multiplier _Is larger than_ the tax multiplier.
Is larger than
Explanation:
Keynesian Cross Model otherwise known as expenditure-output model is used to determine the point where total or aggregate expenditures in the economy are intercept the amount of output produced, i.e equilibrium level of real GDP. In economy, if MPC >0, the government-expenditure multiplier is larger than the tax multiplier.
Chances are that when your company, which sells consulting services to multinationals, is forecasting legal decisions in <u>domestic markets</u>, the predictions will be MUCH MORE accurate than when forecasting legal decisions in <u>foreign markets</u>.
<h3>What is the difference between domestic and foreign markets?</h3>
The difference between domestic and foreign markets is that a company offering forecasting legal decisions will be very more familiar with the domestic market than the decisions that can be taken in foreign markets.
Chances are that when your company, which sells consulting services to multinationals, is forecasting legal decisions in <u>domestic markets</u>, the predictions will be MUCH MORE accurate than when forecasting legal decisions in <u>foreign markets</u>.
Learn more about domestic and foreign markets at brainly.com/question/15115779
Answer:
consequential damages
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of law suits, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Bill can recover the 900 he lost from Carl as consequential damages. These are damages have happened because of one party's failure to meet a certain deadline or contractual obligation and can be proven in court. Therefore since Bill can prove that he lost the 900 because of Carl's negligence he will most likely win that case.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Is the proposed action legal?
Explanation:
The very first step in the decision tree (below) was ignored. Disregarding local laws is ignoring the question of legality.
