Answer:
u haven't gave the statement
<h2>Through t
he concept of prosecutorial immunity.</h2>
Explanation:
In Kalina v. Fletcher (1997), the court ruled that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant. This is occurred when Prosecutor Kalina was sued by Fletcher for making two inaccurate factual statements regarding him during his trial.
Prosecutor Kalina, therefore, seeked the provisions of prosecutorial immunity from the court to gain immunity. However, this was rejected as the court claimed that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant.
This ruling correlate with the concept of prosecutorial immunity becuase she was denied of such immunity. It ruled that her conduct could not be protected through prosecutorial immunity.
Answer:
the answer is b frighten civilians and weaken morale
Explanation:
Answer:
Self control and discipline are expressed in this quote
Explanation:
The essence of Zen is attempting to understand the meaning of life directly, without being misled by logical thought or language. Self discipline and control are central part of Buddhism and the first step is to control one's mind through meditation and other techniques that involve mind and body; to give up logical thinking and avoid getting trapped in a spider's web of words.