Answer:
Explanation:
a county of west central England, part of Hereford and Worcester between 1974 and 1998.
Based on the numbers, Nicaragua.
Answer:
The main difference between the Coronado and La Salle expeditions was the purpose with which each expedition began.
Thus, Coronado carried out his expedition to the southwestern United States with the objective of claiming those territories for the Spanish Empire, territories that had already been explored and in which it was expected to discover native cities full of wealth.
Instead, La Salle carried out his expedition along the Mississippi River with the goal of discovering the territories adjacent to it, and claiming them for the Kingdom of France.
Thus, while the La Salle expedition had a merely territorial and expansionist objective, the Coronado expedition had as its main objective the discovery of sumptuous wealth in the explored territories.
When an argument is deductively valid, its <u>truth of premises </u>guarantee the truth of its <u>conclusion</u>.
<h3>What is a deductively valid argument?</h3>
A deductive argument is an argument intended by the arguer to be deductive, that is, to provide a guarantee of the truthfulness of the conclusion provided that the premises of the argument are true.
It can also be expressed by saying that, in a deductive argument, the premises are intended to provide strong support for the conclusion that if the premises were true, the conclusion could not be false.
The argument in which the premise succeeds in securing the conclusion is called a valid (inferential) argument. If a valid argument has a true premise, the argument is also said to be valid. All arguments are valid or invalid, and valid or not; there's no middle point, like there's some relevance.
To learn more about deductively valid argument from given link
brainly.com/question/14585049
#SPJ4