I think it was to recruit more soldiers, maybe I'm wrong, gl on ur hw!
Life in rural areas of developing countries is prone to many kinds of risk, such as illness or
mortality of household members, crop or other income loss due to natural phenomena (weather,
insect infestations, or fire, for example), and civil conflict. In addition to their contemporaneous
effects, the effects of certain types of shocks may still be felt many years or even decades later.
From a public policy standpoint, it is particularly important to identify shocks that have large
long-run effects. Moreover, the mechanics underlying the persistence of shocks may be of considerable
interest. For example, a health shock may have a long-run effect simply because the
health shock itself persists over time. Alternately, the health shock may not directly affect longrun
outcomes, but it could affect some other outcome—such as educational attainment—that
helps determine long-run well-being.
Brainliest pls! :)
Now, you forgot your options, but i think that I have seen them somewhere else: and the following option is true: he vowed to defeat countries sponsoring terrorism.
Let me know if you had other set of options in mind!
Nagasaki was a shipbuilding center, the very industry intended for destruction. Also, The devastation wrought at Hiroshima was not sufficient to convince the Japanese War Council to accept the Potsdam Conference’s demand for unconditional surrender.
Answer: It was for protection from artillery, and advancements in weapon technology that caused ww1 to be fought in the trenches
Explanation: