The answer to your question is <span> presidential </span>veto<span> to dismantle the Second Bank of the United States by </span>vetoing<span> its congressional recharter.
Hoped I Helped!</span>
Answer:
Statement 1 is false
Explanation:
King George III could not take away our President because, at the time, we did not have one. The very office and, in fact, the entire American government, had not yet been created.
Many people reacted in a good way to the new constitution, while some thought it gave too much power to the government. The Federalists supported the new constitution in 1787, while the Anti-Federalists primarily did not agree with it.
The Federalists were in support of a new constitution. They believed that the Articles of Confederation, which was the United States' first constitution, was too weak and the government needed more power. Under the Articles, the government could not tax citizens, properly create and enforce laws, regulate trade, and draft soldiers. The Federalists felt like this was weakening the country and they needed to amend it. While the Articles ended up getting scrapped altogether, the Federalists were in support of this and wanted to create a new constitution that gave more power to the federal government.
On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists favored the Articles of Confederation and did not want to amend it or create a new constitution. They associated the government having power with British tyranny and thought the power should be in the hands of the states and citizens. They opposed having a new constitution and were scared for their rights, this is why they demanded to have a Bill of Rights.
The answer is A:) Back in the days of Reconstruction, former slave owners needed farm hands to grow crops in order to make money, so when the Civil War came to an end, the white landowners decided to give their former slaves a chance at becoming apart of the south by giving them land to farm in exchange for a percentage of the profit.... Hope this helps!!!!!!
<span />
Answer:
Trade and influence of Syrian Christian Frumentius at King Ezana at a younger age.
Explanation:
Under the reign of King Ezana, the kingdom adopted Christianity as its state religion in 325 or 328. It was during this period, for the first time image of the cross on put in coins.
King Ezana affection towards Christianity developed an early age when he was tutor by the Syrian Christian Frumentius. Frumentius converted the whole kingdom after the acceptance of Christianity by the king.
