I believe the answer is: D. The Supreme Court decided in favor of Heller, that the Second Amendment allows law-abiding U.S. citizens to own and carry handguns in the district.
The case revolve around Heller Suing District of Columbia because he owned various firearms without military license.
The court ruled that the constitution explicitly guarantee the right to bear arms, which become the reason why the supreme court decided in favor of Heller.
The answer that correctly explains the outcome and significance of the District of Columbia v. Heller case is D. The Supreme Court decided in favor of Heller, that the Second Amendment allows law-abiding U.S. citizens to own and carry handguns in the district.
