The answer to your question is B
Answer:
Has not developed an understanding of the cues to performance of these pragmatic skills.
Explanation:
In this context, Understanding cues to performance refers to humans' ability to observe the situation around us, and deliver the most appropriate technique that help us benefit from the situation.
From the excerpt, we know that John has a very good pragmatic skills in general. But this test is most likely taken under a structured situation that does not represent the actual real life. So, when John actually encountered it in his social life, he does not understand when is the proper time to actually use the skill.
The recourse for dealing with overzealous prosecutors includes Private admonition or reprimand. Hence, option A is appropriate.
<h3>What is the meaning of the Prosecutors?</h3>
In jurisdictions with either a civil law independent judiciary or a common law adversarial system, a prosecutor is a prosecuting attorney of the prosecution.
Federal prosecutors want to retry the case. A prosecutor is indeed a legal agent who formally accuses someone else of committing a felony by presenting an argument against that individual in a court of law.
A prosecutor is often a lawyer with a law degree who has been approved as a qualified attorney by the jurisdiction in which they're functioning. This could imply that they have been admitted toward the bar or, if applicable, earned a comparable qualification. Hence, option A is correct.
Learn more about Prosecutor here:
brainly.com/question/12057544
#SPJ1
Answer:
OFFENSE-DEFENSE THEORY AND ITS CRITICS SEAN M. LYNN-JONES important, offense-defense theory contends that international conflict and war are more likely when offense has the advantage, while peace and cooperation are more probable when defense has the advantage."
In 1493, after reports of Columbus’s discoveries had reached them, the Spanish rulers Ferdinand and Isabella enlisted papal support for their claims to the New World in order to inhibit the Portuguese and other possible rival claimants. To accommodate them, the Spanish-born pope Alexander VI issued bulls setting up a line of demarcation from pole to pole 100 leagues (about 320 miles) west of the Cape Verde Islands. Spain was given exclusive rights to all newly discovered and undiscovered lands in the region west of the line. Portuguese expeditions were to keep to the east of the line. Neither power was to occupy any territory already in the hands of a Christian ruler.
No other European powers facing the Atlantic Ocean ever accepted this papal disposition or the subsequent agreement deriving from it. King John II of Portugal was dissatisfied because Portugal’s rights in the New World were insufficiently affirmed, and the Portuguese would not even have sufficient room at sea for their African voyages. Meeting at Tordesillas, in northwestern Spain, Spanish and Portuguese ambassadors reaffirmed the papal division, but the line itself was moved to 370 leagues (1,185 miles) west of the Cape Verde Islands, or about 46°30′ W of Greenwich. Pope Julius II finally sanctioned the change in 1506. The new boundary enabled Portugal to claim the coast of Brazil after its discovery by Pedro Álvares Cabral in 1500. Brazilian exploration and settlement far to the west of the line of demarcation in subsequent centuries laid a firm basis for Brazil’s claims to vast areas of the interior of South America.
