amir would be classified as an on-call worker.
<h3>What is
on-call worker?</h3>
An on-call employee (oproepkracht) works only when you, the employer, summon them. You and your employee have agreed on this. There are various forms of on-call contracts, each with its own set of rules.
An on-call schedule (or on-call shift) is a timetable that guarantees the appropriate person is always accessible, day or night, to respond rapidly to events and outages. On-call doctors in the medical field are expected to respond to medical crises at any moment during their shift.
On call is a vital duty among many IT, developer, support, and operations teams that provide services that customers demand to be available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Team members rotate via an on-call cycle, providing coverage around the clock or solely during normal business hours.
To know more about on-call worker follow the link:
brainly.com/question/12831236
#SPJ4
Answer:
B
Explanation:
If I'm not wrong, their steel industry is still growing due to the inputs of iron ore and coal.
She will be able to m<em>atch </em>downloaded deposits to <em>existing</em> transactions in the Banking Center.
MB been an accountant, she must follows workflow process to ensure efficiency of operation.
- The process of creating invoices, receiving payments, and recording deposits are part of the Workflow process she must adhere to at her place of work.
In conclusion, the process makes the work of employee easier and uncomplicated because its enables them adhere to a strict procedure of getting work done.
Learn more about Workflow process here
<em>brainly.com/question/11939249</em>
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.
C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.
And this is the correct answer:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
Explanation:
City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).
