Answer:
The answer is: Edgar will receive $37,000
Explanation:
- Dowd's share of the company's losses is $80,000
- Edgar's share of the company's losses is $60,000
- Frost's share of the company's losses is $40,000
- Grant's share of the company's losses is $20,000
But since Grant is not willing to give more money to the partnership to cover his losses, the $9,000 difference must be divided by the remaining three partners. So they will divide Grant's losses as follows:
- Dowd's share of the Grant's losses is $3,600
- Edgar's share of the Grant's losses is $2,700
- Frost's share of the Grant's losses is $1,800
Then you add up all the losses the three remaining partners had:
- Dowd' total losses $83,600
- Edgar's total losses $62,700
- Frost's total losses $21,800
So when the partnership was dissolved, Edgar should have received $100,000 (capital) - $62,700 (total losses) = $37,200
I selected answer A since they probably rounded down Edgar's share to $37,000 (nearest possible choice).
Answer:
d. Income Taxes Payable and Salaries Payable
Explanation:
Current liabilities are short term obligations of an entity due for repayment within a period of 12 months.
From the options given d. Income Taxes Payable and Salaries Payable both presents current liabilities.
Answer: B. Charlotte
Explanation:
Preference is given to people that live with the dependent so this puts William at the least priority because he doesn't live with Autumn thereby leaving Charlotte and her mother.
Preference is then given to the biological parents of the dependent which means that Diana is has second priority. Charlotte is therefore the the most preferred to claim her daughter as a dependent which would allow her greater tax deductions.
Answer:
b) decline
Explanation:
If people's trust in the banking system is reduced due to a surge in bank failures, the money expansion resulting from a new deposit will <u>decline</u>. This happens because people lost trust and hastily withdrawn their money deposited with the bank.
Answer:
C) democratic reforms
Explanation:
One of the things I remember when I was a little kid was watching action movies with my father and many of them had a common hero, an American soldier or spy (and James Bond even though he is British), and a common enemy, the Soviet Union or some other communist country.
That was very in the late 80s and early 90s, and probably much earlier. The world was divided into two sides, the side that favored liberty and freedom (the US) and the communist evil nations.
In economic terms, communism and command economies meant that the government controlled most of a country's resources. This had a negative effect in that only politicians and their allies lived well and were rich, while the rest of the population was poor.
But then president Reagan and premier Gorbachev got together and decided that it was time for all the nonsense to stop, and the Berlin Wall fell, the Soviet Union split up and luckily for all (except James Bond and other heroes), communism ended.
The fall of communist led to democratic and capitalistic reforms.
