1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
astra-53 [7]
3 years ago
9

The fiftieth amendment protects the individuals right

History
1 answer:
Mrrafil [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:The Fifteenth Amendment (Amendment XV) to the United States Constitution prohibits the federal government and each state from denying a citizen the right to vote based on that citizen's "race, color, or previous condition of servitude".

Explanation:

I Know this because I am studing Law

You might be interested in
Which of the following were fractions in the weaking of the roman empire​
Mashcka [7]

Answer:There are many reasons that were published in so many books, that will fill bookshelves. Some of the reasons that most of the historians agree are 1) Enforced Christianity and rejection of Roman state symbol as symbol of paganism. Roman...

3 0
2 years ago
What happen during World war 1
mihalych1998 [28]
This is the answer to your question

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Texas was in debt after the Texas Revolution. What was proposed to happen to the Texas debt if they were annexed into the United
e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

If Texas relinquished their land to the United States exchange for a cash payment that would wipe out their debt

5 0
2 years ago
Why did bennett champ clark believe that the neutrality act was necessary?
tangare [24]
The correct answer is to prevent from getting d<span>ragged into a conflict that they don't have a true connection too

He was an isolationist and believed that it would be extremely bad to enter the conflict that was not related to them. The neutrality act was thus necessary in order to ensure that the country would remain neutral and would not wage wars that were not related to them and would not meddle in foreign affairs.</span>
4 0
2 years ago
PLEASE HELP ASAP <br><br> WILL MARK BRAINLIEST <br><br> ANSWER IN A COMPLETE PARAGRAPH
Umnica [9.8K]

Answer:

The bill was controversial beause it resulted in the geneocide of the American Indian. At the time southern and norhtern land owners alike. The bill called for voluntary removal of Amerian Indians from their lands, however this is not how it happened. Often Amerrican Indians were forced off of their ancestorial lands through pressure and fource.  American Indians were eventually forced to move as far as from Northern Georgia to Oklahoma, reuslting in many Indians dying of disease, starvation and due to exposure to the elements along the way.

Explanation:

Just add this in to what you have

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was a result of the French and Indian war?
    6·1 answer
  • At the outset of the secessionist movement in the south, which state defeated the cooperationist argument that the south should
    10·1 answer
  • Which issue did the Land Ordinance of 1785 address? 1.slavery in the thirteen states 2.settling public lands in the West 3.trade
    12·2 answers
  • How did African slaves build strong community ties with one another in the<br> Americas?
    14·1 answer
  • What were the Chinese people seeking freedom from during the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries?
    12·2 answers
  • How did the southern delegates of the Democratic Party view the slavery issue?
    10·2 answers
  • List countries from which the United States acquired territory between 1803 and 1853
    7·1 answer
  • What was the German code name for Germany’s invasion of the Soviet Union
    9·1 answer
  • In what way did World War I affect women's suffrage in the United States? (2 points)  a The fact that women in other Allied coun
    13·1 answer
  • What were the advantages of establishing Meroë as the new capital of Kush?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!