Answer:
Possible options:
a. aptitude-motivated infant
b. achievement-motivated infant
c. consciously motivated infant
d. competence-motivated infant
Answer is D
Explanation:
Competence motivation theory is a conceptual framework designed to explain individuals' motivation to participate, persist, and work hard in any particular achievement context. The central thesis of the theory is that individuals are attracted to participate in activities at which they feel competent or capable.
Answer:
A) Dedicated resources for compliance of standards.
Explanation:
As per the question, all the given options could be regarded as 'effective compliance program policies' except for the 'few dedicated resources for compliance of standards' in the matters of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act as they are significant to ensure the standards of FCPA. The other three options display quite beneficial compliance program policies as 'experienced personnel in compliance functions' help in the effective functioning of the policies, 'the independence of compliance personnel in management' provide them with enough authority to make decisions and 'unclear reporting structure for compliance personnel' assists in producing effective reports. Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
<span>When a scientist needs to <u>observe </u>they make observations. Observing is a fundamental part of scientific investigation. Observations of natural phenomenon lead scientists to ask questions, research and form a hypothesis. When the scientist sets up experiments to teat out their hypothesis again the scientists must use their observation skills to monitor their test and make sure there are no mistakes.</span>
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.