The U.S Supreme Court pronounced the balancing test in the Turner v. Safley case. The balancing test means that the courts must balance the rights of inmates against the penological concerns of security and order.
In this case, the U.S Supreme Court upheld broad restriction on inmate-to-inmate correspondence and, in the process, reaffirmed its commitment to a deferential standard in prisoner speech cases.
In Justice O’Connor’s opinion in Turner v. Safley, he identified four factors to consider when applying this standard:
- Whether or not there is a valid, rational link between the regulation and the governmental interest advanced to justify it;
- Whether inmates are left with alternative means of exercising the right that the regulation restricts;
- Whether accommodating the asserted right would have a significant ripple effect on fellow inmates or prison staff;
- And whether there is a ready alternative to the regulation that fully accommodates the asserted right at a minimal cost to valid penological interests.
To know more about penology here-
brainly.com/question/28043931
#SPJ4
Hi
Your answer is ASEAN
Hope this helps
Have a great day
please mark me brainliest
~Courtney
Answer:
4. All of these
Explanation:
As developed by J. Stacy Adams, a behavioral psychologist in the 1960s, equity theory seeks to understand the equality in distribution of resources among individuals. It is measured by comparing ratio of contributions to ratio of rewards. This theory explains employees or workers need to balance their input in their work and the reward or output they get from it.
I think the answer is letter <span>B. Democracy spread, and the United States became the world’s sole superpower
The fall of USSR had allowed democracy and independence amongst the countries that were under the USSR. Gorbachev unknowingly gave people the right to express themselves. With USSR down, the US was able to stop the cold war and become a superpower.
</span>
The central government in federalism is the government that would be most powerful because it would combine the powers of the states but still won’t be that much more powerful than the states
