<span>After decreasing Nominal & Real GDP, the Federal Reserve will engage in Contractionary Monetary Policy. The answer is letter B. IF the Federal Reserve increases the amount of monetary growth, the economic theory shows that it will decrease in the short run but will increase eventually in the long run from their initial value.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
It wouldn't now, unless you are very wealthy. Interest rates are very low and you would have to go into the junk bond market to get any kind of decent return. But Junk Bonds are or can be very unstable and you get a high return for a very chancy situation.
I think I know what the question wants you to understand. You need something that will provide with income. You just don't want to deal with bonds. There are stocks around that pay dividends; they are very conservative and if they go down, that will be the least of your problems.
You can then devote your resources to capital gains or pure stocks: no interest payments, but the stock itself goes up. There is a whole different tax system for capital gains.
You should also get some gold or silver as insurance.
Since you have asked about stocks and bonds, I have not said anything about cryptos. That's an option, but you have to be very knowledgeable because those things can be an investment nightmare.
Answer:
Letter E is correct. <em>Dominating.</em>
Explanation:
The dominating conflict-handling style is one that puts your individual interests above the interests of other individuals or your team.
This style is characterized by individuals who rely on forced behavior over another to resolve some existing conflict or to gain some position. It is a style based on profit and loss.
<u>The reason that Pablo Picasso, become wealthy during his lifetime and the artist, Vincent van Gogh, remain poor his entire life:</u>
Pablo Picasso and Vincent van Gogh had more features in common. They had unanimously indistinct style of arts which had become immediately identifiable.
In spite of all that, Picasso died as a rich man owning an estate which is estimated at nearly 750 million dollar whereas Van Gogh died as a pauper.
Studies claim that the reason behind this would be that, Van Gogh remained to be a loner and socially inactive. He was depending on his brother to meet the social world and in contrast Picasso was a charismatic active member in various social clubs where her had multiple number of contacts and connections.
It's been said that Pablo Picasso was a hub who had a vast network of social lines and Vincent Van Gogh was a silent or solitary node.
But now, the paintings of both the greatest artists were well spoken and sell for more than 100,000,000 US Dollars.
