Answer:
B.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided it can be said that people are still uncomfortable with other ethnic groups marrying into their families and living in their neighborhoods. This form of segregation still exists today in the United States of America, and mostly seems to be so because many groups prefer to live and share their space with only people from their same culture and background.
 
        
             
        
        
        
<span>software publishers,software purchasers,the government  hope that helps</span><span>
</span>
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:please refer to the explanation section
Explanation:
Mechanic = $100
Vet = $100
Alex (payment from vet) = $100
Will's $100 bill has created $300. 
This situation is explained in detail by the concept known has the multiplier. The multiplier measures how much impact will a change in an exogenous variable will cause in endogenous variables, for example How much a increase in Government spending will change Gross Domestic Product.
The multiplier in this case is 3, 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The employer will be held liable.
Explanation:
If the external agent brings harm or injury to a third party in the course of an employment, the employer is held liable. When a principal directs an agent to commit for a tort or if the principal is aware of the consequences of carrying the instructions of the agent could cause harm or injure the person, then the principal is liable.
It is called direct liability.
The liability for the intentional tort which is imputed to the principal when the agent acts to further the business of the principal.
The agent is personally liable under the following circumstances :
-    Foreign principal
- Agent signs the contract in his own name
- Non-existent principal
-   Principal cannot be sued:
- Undisclosed principal
Example :
A credit card company hires a sales person and offers a company van to make sales in that area. The sales person uses the office van to official purposes. But one night, he drove the car to a friend's party and while coming he drove over a pedestrian. In this case, the owner of the company will not be held liable as the sales person uses the company van for his personal use while going out for party with his friends. While causing the accident, the sales person was not not using the office van for official purposes and was not tendering official duties at that time.