1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pavel [41]
3 years ago
15

What events led to the treaty of Hudaibiyya? Why could it be said that Muhammad compromised on almost every point of the treaty

yet still came out the winner?
Social Studies
1 answer:
mylen [45]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The event that led to the Treaty of Hudaibiyya was the refusal of polytheist (Quraysh tribe) to allow the Muslim to perform Hajj in Mecca.

It can be said that Mohammed compromised on every point of the treaty and yet came out winner, because

1. Even though, he along with his followers were not allowed to performed Hajj that year, they were allowed to performed Hajj for the following 10 years.

2. He noticed that there is a chance for him to separate the tribe of Quraysh from the tribe of Khaybar, thus enabling him to infiltrate and spread the message of Islam.

3. He also managed to swayed the public opinion of himself and that of his Muslim followers, which enhance the peaceful nature of the Muslim, and diminish that of Quraysh.

Explanation:

The Treaty of Hudaibiyya, was a treaty between the Muslim lead by Muhammed and Tribe of Quraysh. The treaty came to be as a result of tension and refusal of Quraysh to allow the Muslim entered Mecca and perform Hajj.

Mohammed used the opportunity to enhance the reputation of Islam, and was able to sign a treaty, with the Quraysh.

Some of the terms of the treaty are:

1. To refrain from war among each other during the time of treaty.

2. Any tribe from the Arab may form alliance with either the Muslim or Quraysh if they so wishes.

3. The treaty was a for period of ten years.

Some of the points considered to make Mohammed appeared victorious in the treaty are:

1. It enhances the Muslim reputation of being peaceful among the Non Muslims

2. It exposes the Mohammed followers to understand that good politics is a means of spreading Islam

3. Some of the Muslim that stay behind in Mecca, served as infiltrators.

You might be interested in
ond, in your own view, what role (if any) does Black Nationalism havetoday? Is this a relevant philosophy for social change in t
vova2212 [387]

Answer:

Even though black nationalism helped the abolition of race segregation, its role in modernity is only commemorative. It is also irrelevant and would propitiate racial segregation because it only looks to empower one minority and separate it from the rest. Because it does what it looked like to prevent and disappear, segregation.

Explanation:

First of all, nowadays the role of black Nationalism is only commemorative and even though it provided society a great benefit, it is outdated to modern society because inclusion, multiversity, and equality are promoted and sought effectively. It is irrelevant to our philosophical and social state because by only working towards the benefit of a certain minority it performs what it sought to eliminate. The segregation of minorities, today we live in a very integrated and cooperative society that has overcome movements to empower minorities. We don't have a perfect society but all of the social groups are equally valued and protected by law. Therefore, it is an outdated ideology.

3 0
3 years ago
ASAP answer thank u Tysmm
Flura [38]

Answer:

Pyramids

Explanation:

thats the only building/ stepped

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is generally true regarding change in the workplace? Q A) Most people accept change easily. SB
k0ka [10]

Answer:

C. Change in the workplace occurs somewhat infrequently.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
What is one result of the Spanish invasion of Mexico?
nikdorinn [45]
A is the correct answer
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is the most likely reason that members of Congress passes resolution
aleksandr82 [10.1K]

Answer:

The answer is Trusted the president was obscuring the partition of forces set up by the constitution.  

Explanation:

The partition of forces gives an arrangement of shared power known as Checks and Balances. Three branches are made in the Constitution. The Legislative, made out of the House and Senate, is set up in Article 1. The Executive, made out of the President, Vice-President, and the Departments, is set up in Article 2.Montesquieu characterize the essential parts of the administration to be the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. Aristocrat Montesquieu being a judge himself, plainly characterized the Judicial as being separate from the official and autonomous of the other two branches.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • You may lose your license __________ A. when you turn 70 years old. B. if you accumulate too many points on your driving record.
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the rights of the muslim women under islamic law?
    15·1 answer
  • Professor McClure believes that young children are frequently able to make morally correct decisions because humans are endowed
    6·1 answer
  • The Jews were so pleased with Paul's message they sent the leading officers of the city to hear Paul. True False
    15·2 answers
  • Why did Jefferson believe a free press was necessary in a democracy?
    5·2 answers
  • Quiz
    5·1 answer
  • What were Qin Shihuangdi's goals for the Qin dynasty?
    10·2 answers
  • Most people in Africa __________.
    9·2 answers
  • Hold a speech contest on 'Unity in Diversity in Nepal'​
    6·2 answers
  • Baby Jamal typically eats and sleeps on a regular schedule and usually responds positively to new people and sounds. Based on th
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!