Answer:
B. It demonstrated Western Europeans' growing fears about the spread of communism.
Explanation:
Churchill described the Soviet threat as an "iron curtain." Clearly, he thought it was dangerous and pervasive. This was near the start of the Cold War tensions, so we can be sure that A and D are not correct. At this point, capitalism and communism are rallying their forces for defense or attack. And C doesn't make sense, because Churchill does not reference or imply nuclear power in any context in this quote.
Answer:
<em>The 'Youth Bulge Theory' is a concept which determines young men and women as an increasing population as well as volatile historically. </em>
<u>Explanation:
</u>
It occurs particularly in least developed countries and mainly in developing countries. This theory identifies the idea of raising potential for rebellion by the presence of even more than 20 percent of young people. 'Youth Bulge Theory' is helpful in decreasing infant mortality rates. Hence, the Youth Bulge theory of South Africa best explains this theory.
Judaism and Cristianity spread around the world because Jews where kicked out of their countries to other parts of the world, and Christianity spread because of the work of their missionaries.
The two nations relationship became very positive, in terms of democratic ideals, anti-communism, and high levels of economic trade. Today, the US is one of Germany's closest allies and partners outside of the European Union. ... Americans want Germany to play a more active military role, but Germans strongly disagree.
It largely depends on what city state we are talking about. People at this time didn't identify as Greeks they were Thebans, Ionians, Athenians, Thracians and so on.
Syracuse and Corinth had well developed democratic systems and many of the other city states had democratic components. Even the militaristic duel monarchy of the Spartans had some democracy. The Spartan Ephors were elected and had enough power to exile kings if desired. Let's look at the most commonly cited city state though, Athens.
Athenians utilized a direct democracy compared to Roman republic and everything would be voted upon. Who would lead the armies, what kind of trade arrangements, who the diplomatic envoys would be; pretty much everything. Romans elected specific individuals to handle regional business like a representative of the people, the senators and provincial governors.
Athens was slightly more equal then the Roman system. Under the Athenian law all free citizens technically had equal rights in the government. In Rome the Patricians, Equestrians and Plebeians had strictly defined roles both legally and legislatively.
The reverse of the above point were the inclusiveness of the two systems. Athens had draconian regulations on who qualified as a free member of the city state. Rome comparatively welcomed a large swath of people and actively sought to latinize the frontiers.
Rome had two consistent political parties. Politics would be marked by conflict between the Conservatives and the Populares. Athens comparatively had many political blocks that were constantly evolving and changing beliefs.
The most distinct difference between the system is probably the adaptability of them though. The Roman system was extremely complex, but was constantly changing and adapting to meet the changing times. The Athenian system would become bogged down as time progressed and would essentially become little more then another oligarchy towards its end.
