Which of the following rights would not be supported by the Constitution if challenged in court?

History

2 answers:

Grace [21]3 years ago

3 0

Printing opinions that take away others rights

valentinak56 [21]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

correct option is printing opinion that take away others rights

Explanation:

If a person have licence to keep a rifle he can choose a rifle to purchase.

If a person commit any crime, he has a right to hire a lawyer for his defense.

if a president has done any mistake than people has right to hold a meeting to complaint about the president

But printing opinions that take away others' rights is not supported by the constitution if challenged in court. Because Everyone has some fundamental rights which no one can take. Printing opinions that take away others right is against the constitution and if it is challenged in the court than it will not be supported by the constitution.

You might be interested in

Name 2 main teaching of jesus

Alinara [238K]

Jesus showed compassion for all and helped them: the poor, the despised, the outcasts, and wants us to do the same (Matt. 4:24-25;9:9-13).
The Christian life is marked by baptism (Matt. 3:13-17).

5 0

3 years ago

The spanish conquistadors or soldiers became the representatives of the king of spain and governor general in its colonies. fals

Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The Spanish king chose people to be governors in the colonies.

3 0

2 years ago

The war on the western front was the stalemate buy 1916 what was the effect of this development

slava [35]

Neither side made progress in the war

4 0

3 years ago

Title ix of the education amendments act of 1972 requires schools to _____

natima [27]

Title ix prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which description of Adam Smith is accurate? A. author of Das Kapital and founder of communism B. author of The Wealth of Nation

sergejj [24]

Adam Smith was the B) author of "The Wealth of Nations" and could be considered the father of modern economics, but more accurately should be considered the father of "modern capitalism."

3 0

3 years ago