The mistakes in the footnote are the following:
1. The number one should be written in a superscript. In an essay's text, content that will be footnoted should be marked with a raised number immediately after the lines or ideas that are being cited. This has to be applied the same way when starting the footnote.
2. Three more line spaces should be added before the footnote. By separating the footnote from the text, we can prevent some problems in the reading flow.
3. There needs to be a period at the end. Like in every case, a final period will indicate that the idea is concluded, so you can immediately move to the next footnote.
Here is the correct order of the events from earliest to latest.
1) Germany invades Poland- This took place on September 1, 1939.
2) Japanese attack Pearl Harbor- This took place on December 7, 1941.
3) The Allied forces invaded Europe on D-Day on June 6, 1944.
4) The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki took place in August of 1945.
Answer:
“I do think that if there were a long term—I don’t know, 18, 20 years, something like that, and it was fixed—I would say that was fine. In fact, it’d make my life a lot simpler, to tell you the truth.” – Justice Stephen Breyer1
“The Framers adopted life tenure at a time when people simply did not live as long as they do now. A judge insulated from the normal currents of life for twenty-five or thirty years was a rarity then, but is becoming commonplace today. Setting a term of, say, fifteen years would ensure that federal judges would not lose all touch with reality through decades of ivory tower existence. It would also provide a more regular and greater degree of turnover among the judges. Both developments would, in my view, be healthy ones.” – Future Chief Justice John Roberts2
The rules governing the U.S. Supreme Court must be updated to reflect the reality of life in modern America. The average tenure of a Supreme Court justice has significantly lengthened since the establishment of the federal judiciary in the 1700s, giving outsize power to nine individuals in a way the framers of the Constitution could never have imagined. This longevity has resulted in a lack of regularity in vacancies, introducing further randomness to the judicial selection process. As a result, the confirmation process for the highest court has become politically divisive, with extremely narrow votes and theatrics from the nominees themselves. This state of affairs is untenable; policymakers must address it by enacting legislation to create term limits for justices.
