School rules and government rules are very similar, some similarity are no steeling and drugs and an average high school with no rules would be chaotic.
Answer:
13.02%
Explanation:
Debt = 30% and Common stock = 70%
Cost of equity is 16% and debt is 8%
Tax is 24%
WACC = Cost of equity*Weight of equity + After tax cost of debt*Weight of debt
WACC = (0.16*0.70) + (0.08*(1-0.24)*0.30)
WACC = 0.112 + 0.01824
WACC = 0.13024
WACC = 13.02%
So, the the company's WACC is 13.02%
<em>Answer</em>:
<u>5,692.83</u> 3.
Explanation:
($10,082 billion/177.1) x 100 = 5,692.83
Remember the real GDP takes into account the value of the total number of goods and services produced by a country in a given year, while taking the effect of inflation into account.
Because of inflation the consumer price index data is used in the calculation to find the change or deflation that has occurred.
In a within-groups design, there are two types of this design which are:
- The repeated-measures design
- The concurrent-measures design
<h3>What is within-groups design?</h3>
A within-groups design is known to be a kind of an experimental design that is one where each participant is said to often experiences the total levels of the independent variable.
Note that there are two types of this design which is the repeated-measures design whose role is to measure or one where participants are said to be opened to a lot of levels of the independent variable and they are known to be tested on the dependent variable after every exposure.
The second is said to be the concurrent-measures design and this is one where participants are said to communicate with the different levels of the independent variable in a simultaneous way..
Hence, In a within-groups design, there are two types of this design which are:
- The repeated-measures design
- The concurrent-measures design
Learn more about concurrent-measures design from
brainly.com/question/25662476
#SPJ1
Answer:
<em>Purchasing power parity (PPP): </em>The principle suggests that if the purchasing powers are the same in two different countries, their exchange rates would be in equilibrium.
<em>Happening:</em> When inflation occurs in the US and it occurs more rapidly than in other nations, the currency, the dollar, will be less attractive to other nations. This means that the dollar's exchange rate with the currency of another nation will increase.
Explanation:
Suppose the rate of exchange between pound and dollar is 1 pound= 1.5 dollar before inflation. When inflation happens it may be 1 pound= 2 dollars.
If it has greater buying power, the currency will be demanded more. The US dollar was more requested before inflation, as 1 pound is spent on buying just $1.5. When inflation occurs, the dollar's buying power goes down and it gets less needed. 1 pound is already being spent on that time but to buy more dollars, 2 dollars.
