1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lions [1.4K]
3 years ago
15

Your regular price is $30/unit, unit variable cost is $20/unit and fixed costs are $3,000 per month. Because of the recession, y

our sales have dropped to 200 units a month, so you are losing money. You are considering two options to increase sales:
(1) reduce the price to $28/unit, or
(2) run an advertising campaign, which will cost you $300 a month, but keep the price at $30/unit.
In both scenarios, you estimate that sales will increase by 20%, from 200 to 240 units per month.

Required:

a) Compute total revenues, costs and profits under the status quo (original situation), and for each of the two new options.

b) Based on your results in (a), what should you do: do nothing, reduce the price or run the advertising campaign?
(enter 1 for "do nothing", 2 for "reduce price", 3 for "advertising")

c) If you solved (a) and (b) correctly, you are still losing money despite choosing the best option. Should you shut down your business in the short term? Explain why or why not.

Business
1 answer:
Jet001 [13]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Answer is in table which is attached in the attachment. Please refer to the attachment.

Explanation:

<em>Calculations:</em>

Status quo: Revenue 30* 200= 6000, VC 30*20= 4000, CM 6000-4000= 2000, 2000-3000= -1000 (Contribution Margin – fixed cost = Profit/Loss)

(b) Since the loss is less in Advertising even after $300 cost of advertisement, so we would choose the option 3 for advertising.

(c). In order to survive in the period of recession, a business needs cash and reducing operation expenses can do it better. This business is in loss from last three months so it might be useful to shut down the business for some period.

You might be interested in
Under corporate social responsibility theory, to who(m) does the chairman and CEO of the company owe an ethical duty? a) The wor
Morgarella [4.7K]

Answer: Option B

 

Explanation: In simple words, corporate social responsibility refers to the business model which states that the business organisation has gained its resources from all its stake holders and hence it owes some moral accountability to all of them.

Thus, as per the given case, the chairman owes responsibility to all the stakeholder whether they are customers, shareholders, workers and community.

3 0
3 years ago
Police: 911, what’s your emergency<br> Me: omae wa mou shindeiru ✨nani?!?✨<br> Police: *ded*
Ludmilka [50]

TeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ vTeeHee ✨ vTeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ vvTeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ vTeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ vvTeeHee ✨ TeeHee ✨ vvv teehee

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Scott wants to swim across a river that is 400 meters wide. He begins swimming perpendicular to the shore he started from but en
Natasha2012 [34]
Hi the answer is 2 cool huh it’s a joke I don’t really know
6 0
3 years ago
You are a manager who has run into some conflict between two of your departments. Both departments are overworked and complainin
navik [9.2K]

Answer:

Collaboration.

Explanation:

Collaboration is the process by which two or more people or group's come together to achieve a particular goal. It usually needs leadership to guide it's activities, and is similar to cooperation.

The departments are complaining and saying the other one has it easy. Bother departments are functioning independently.of one another and so cannot understand the unique challenges faced by the other team.

When they collaborate they pool their resources together to achieve more. They also get to understand the pain points of the other department and this helps foster a good work environment.

4 0
3 years ago
Four companies were sued by customers for injuries sustained from faulty products. All four companies settled out of court for $
Anettt [7]

Answer:

d. A company with assets totaling $50 billion.

Explanation:

In order to calculate the material impact of the lawsuit on each company, we must divide the settlement by total assets. In this case, we do not need to do the math, we simply have to select which company has the most assets. The more assets a company has, the lesser the material impact of any unfavorable settlement.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Lisa Smith decided to start her CPA practice as a professional​ corporation, Smith​ CPA, PC. The corporation purchased an office
    8·1 answer
  • Assets are equal to
    12·1 answer
  • Newtech inc. hires john for the position of a software programmer to work on their new project. salary paid to john by newtech i
    11·1 answer
  • Assets, costs, and current liabilities are proportional to sales. Long-term debt and equity are not. The company maintains a con
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP *(only right answers plz)* Which example is an investment commodity? (Select the best answer.) steel shares in
    11·1 answer
  • The shape of the AVC curve arises because of​ _______. A. constant returns B. increasing returns initially and eventually dimini
    13·1 answer
  • Agencies are crucial to modern business relationships, since it is almost impossible for the owner of a business to conduct all
    13·1 answer
  • List the elements of the implied warranty of merchantability and provide an example of a sale of goods that includes this warran
    15·1 answer
  • A limited partnership is an agreement between at least _____ general partner(s) and ______ limited partner(s).
    9·1 answer
  • marks corporation has two operating departments, drilling and grinding, and an office. the three categories of office expenses a
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!