Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
The objective of this experiment is to test if two different foam-expanding agents have the same foam expansion capacity
Sample 1 (aqueous film forming foam)
n₁= 5
X[bar]₁= 4.7
S₁= 0.6
Sample 2 (alcohol-type concentrates )
n₂= 5
X[bar]₂= 6.8
S₂= 0.8
Both variables have a normal distribution and σ₁²= σ₂²= σ²= ?
The statistic to use to make the estimation and the hypothesis test is the t-statistic for independent samples.:
t= ![\frac{(X[bar]_1 - X[bar]_2) - (mu_1 - mu_2)}{Sa*\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2 } } }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%28X%5Bbar%5D_1%20-%20X%5Bbar%5D_2%29%20-%20%28mu_1%20-%20mu_2%29%7D%7BSa%2A%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn_1%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn_2%20%7D%20%7D%20%7D)
a) 95% CI
(X[bar]_1 - X[bar]_2) ±
*
Sa²=
=
= 0.5
Sa= 0.707ç

(4.7-6.9) ± 2.306* 
[-4.78; 0.38]
With a 95% confidence level you expect that the interval [-4.78; 0.38] will contain the population mean of the expansion capacity of both agents.
b.
The hypothesis is:
H₀: μ₁ - μ₂= 0
H₁: μ₁ - μ₂≠ 0
α: 0.05
The interval contains the cero, so the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.
<u>Complete question</u>
a. Find a 95% confidence interval on the difference in mean foam expansion of these two agents.
b. Based on the confidence interval, is there evidence to support the claim that there is no difference in mean foam expansion of these two agents?
Answer:

General Formulas and Concepts:
<u>Calculus</u>
Limits
Limit Rule [Variable Direct Substitution]: 
Limit Rule [Variable Direct Substitution Exponential]: 
Limit Property [Multiplied Constant]: 
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
<em>Identify</em>

<u>Step 2: Solve</u>
- Rewrite [Limit Property - Multiplied Constant]:
![\displaystyle \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{1}{4}[f(x)]^4 = \frac{1}{4} \lim_{x \to 0} [f(x)]^4](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%20%5Clim_%7Bx%20%5Cto%200%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%7D%5Bf%28x%29%5D%5E4%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%7D%20%5Clim_%7Bx%20%5Cto%200%7D%20%5Bf%28x%29%5D%5E4)
- Evaluate limit [Limit Rule - Variable Direct Substitution Exponential]:
![\displaystyle \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{1}{4}[f(x)]^4 = \frac{1}{4}(4^4)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%20%5Clim_%7Bx%20%5Cto%200%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%7D%5Bf%28x%29%5D%5E4%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%7D%284%5E4%29)
- Simplify:
![\displaystyle \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{1}{4}[f(x)]^4 = 64](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%20%5Clim_%7Bx%20%5Cto%200%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%7D%5Bf%28x%29%5D%5E4%20%3D%2064)
Topic: AP Calculus AB/BC (Calculus I/I + II)
Unit: Limits
Book: College Calculus 10e
Answer:
B and J switch because J is a repeating number and repeating numbers are irrational because they don't have a definte end. Other than that, you are good!
Step-by-step explanation:
<span>Exponent
is a number used to express shorter equation; it is a number that says how many
times you are going to multiply the base number.
</span><span>
Exponents have several laws, here are
some:
=> x^1 = x
=> x^0 = 1
=> x^-1 = 1/x
=> x^m x^n = X^m+n
=> x^m/x^n = x^m-n
And since we were asked to write an
expression with a negative exponent that has a value between 0 and ½
=> 2^ -2 = ½
</span>
Answer:
Amy: 0.78 Gallons
Dan : 0.14 Gallons
Mike: 0.5 Gallons
Answer: Amy
Step-by-step explanation:
Look closely