The first one is MLA style because it’s what colleges like to see
Answer:
1st Option: Discrimination committed by governments and discrimination committed by individuals.
Explanation:
In 1883, The United States Supreme Court ruled that the Civil Rights act of 1875, forbidding discrimination in hotels, trains, and other public spaces, was unconstitutional and not authorized by the 13th or 14th Amendments of the Constitution.
She knew the land very well and she knew how to interact with other Indian tribes and if she wasn't with them, they could've been killed possibly by other Indian tribes because the white man was looked down upon by them because they had forced them out of their lands before
The patron of the painting where a man is holding a large medal and wearing a ring is most likely C. the rich merchant in the painting.
<h3>Who would be the patron of this painting?</h3>
The painting shows a man who is showing off his medal and ring which is a sign of him being part of the upper class.
This means that it is the man himself who most likely asked for the painting to be made to showcase his class. Seeing as merchants were quite wealthy at the time, he was most probably a merchant as well.
Find out more on this old paintings at brainly.com/question/954612.
Answer:
I think the answer is "because they did not share the same views" but, if you give me some answer choices I should be able to answer more to your liking.
Explanation:
Different victors wanted different things, so they couldn't ALL have everything they wanted. Britain and France did NOT want a League of Nations, but Wilson insisted on little else. Clemenceau wanted crippling reparations, Wilson and Lloyd George didn't
