The answer to the 3rd question is that chromosomes are tightly coiled bundles of DNA and carry many genes. For the 4th question, asexual reproduction can occur by binary fission and creates exact genetic copies of a parent.
We can confirm that the absence of photosynthesis on Earth would cause a mass extinction of most of the species on the planet.
<h3 /><h3>Why would the absence of photosynthesis be so harmful?</h3>
The process of photosynthesis is extremely important as it produces oxygen as a byproduct. The absence of this process on Earth would limit the available oxygen in the atmosphere which would at some point be entirely consumed. From then on, most species on the planet would die out as they require oxygen to live. Most plant species would also die off as they use photosynthesis to sustain life.
Therefore, we can confirm that the absence of photosynthesis on planet Earth could be considered an apocalyptic event as it would cause a near-complete extinction of life on the planet.
To learn more about photosynthesis visit:
brainly.com/question/1388366?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ1
Answer:
<u>The woodpeckers wouldn't have homes/shelters to keep themselves safe so they would slowly die out.</u>
Answer 2:
I'm pretty sure you can also say, <u>they would have to adapt to living in a new species of tree</u>
<u></u>
I hope this helped
Answer:
the tuba player is over heated
Explanation:
wool mostly conserves body heat. especially in warm weather...
<span>Cellulose is a lot stronger than starch. Starch is practically
useless
as a material, but celluose is strong enough to make fibers from, and
hence rope, clothing, etc. Cellulose doesn't dissolve in water the way
starch will, and doesn't break down as easily.
</span>Your body contains
enzymes that break starch down into glucose to fuel your body. But
we humans don't have enzymes that can break down cellulose.
