Answer: cooperation; aggression; most people cooperate
Explanation:
<em>Two of Daniel's group members do not seem interested in contributing. Daniel begins to get frustrated that his goal of completing the task is blocked. Daniel remembers that </em><em><u>cooperation</u></em><em> is better than </em><em><u>aggression</u></em><em>, especially when </em><em><u>most people cooperate</u></em><em>.</em>
It is better to try to cooperate with others than to be aggressive. Aggression can have the effect of pushing people away or putting them under pressure which can invariably lead to lower quality work.
In this case it is better that Daniel tries to cooperate with the other 2 members who are interested in contributing as they still constitute a majority. When the other 2 see this, they may become encouraged to join in the discussion.
If Daniel responds with aggression, it might even push away the other 2 members that seem interested in contributing because they may not feel comfortable working with him.
Yes, this is true.
This is especially evident in countries such as India and Pakistan, which have a very big population and a significant hunger problem- meaning that there is not enough food to feed the whole population.
In a Zero population growth, the number of people stays stable over time.
The answer to what concerned epistemic communities more is environmental issues. Epistemic communities, their value, and effect on transboundary issues are highly prejudiced by the work of Peter M. Haas' Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. The occurrence of epistemic communities came to be by the demanding complex issues existing to decision makers.
The answer is why does the government not make the affordable health care plan?
Answer:
a theory of learning based on the idea that all behaviors are acquired through conditioning.