In a series of Supreme Court rulings under Chief Justice Earl Warren, beginning with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, "separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional because new research demonstrated that separating students by "race" was detrimental to them, even if facilities were equal.
<h3>Which Supreme Court decision caused the separate but equal concept to be abolished?</h3>
- The separate but equal theory was abolished as a result of the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court ruling.
- The 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. Board of Education, which overturned the "separate but equal" principle and ordered an end to school segregation, is one of the most well-known decisions to come out of this time period.
- "Separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional in a series of Supreme Court decisions made under Chief Justice Earl Warren, starting with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, because new research showed that dividing students by "race" was harmful to them even if facilities were equal.
- "Separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional in a series of Supreme Court decisions made under Chief Justice Earl Warren, starting with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, because new research showed that dividing students by "race" was harmful to them even if facilities were equal.
To learn more about the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court, refer to the following link:
brainly.com/question/9822748
#SPJ4
Answer:The Age of Absolutism is usually thought to begin with the reign of Louis XIV (1643–1715) and ends with the French Revolution (1789). Absolutism was primarily motivated by the crises of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
Explanation:
<span>To divide we the people to weaken us, set us against each other with blame games and propaganda. Party loyalty blinders keep us from watching too closely what our own party representatives are doing against our own interests.
Like professional wrestlers they appear to be bitter rivals in public but are the best of friends behind closed doors. They have led us to think that only someone from their parties can win an election. If we vote for a third party candidate we have "thrown our vote away" on someone who stands no chance of winning and let that "evil other party" candidate win. We feel compelled to vote for the "lesser" of the two evils being offered.
Consider this: Both parties of the Senate said that the TARP bill lacked oversight to protect the taxpayer's money (concerning the original 3 page one passed by the House of Representatives). They claimed they were going to add protection and oversight to it. Then behind closed doors they added 137 pages of earmark spending and NO oversight or protection. Bush signed it and they closed the 110 Session of Congress knowing that they had an automatic pay raise in place. Both parties were involved so no evil other party blame games could be played.
Instead they faked outrage when the AIG bonus news came out and blamed the Management for not following rules which they had failed to put into the TARP bill in the first place. Watch this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu...</span>
It plays a huge role sometimes it can cause disagreements and other times it can cause friendships and happiness. Either way life is diverse
6. And 7. Is True. The rest I have no clue. Sorry
