Predicting the next item in a pattern is an example of inductive reasoning? True or false
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
y = -3x + 5
Step-by-step explanation:
Usually by drawing a simple graph, you can tell what the equation is, even if the graph isn't 100% accurate. From the points alone, you can tell that the slope is negative, since as you increase in x you decrease in y (which is a negative relationship). You can tell that it's +5 rather than -5 because the graph sketched shows that the line goes above 0 (indicating a positive number), rather than below (a negative number).
Answer:
the width of sue's interval will be narrower than javier's.
Step-by-step explanation:
in this problem, i do believe that sue's interval will be more narrow. in the formula,
p-hat ± ,
a larger "n" value will lead to a smaller standard error. given that the population proportion is the same for both, and the sample size is the only difference, the standard error of sue's interval will be smaller than javier's, therefore making her whole confidence interval smaller.
again, i do believe this is correct, this is what i have in my AP stat notes. hope this helps!