Answer:
No, Jim is not correct.
Explanation:
Betty will win this case.
Generally, the law encourages marriage as its policy. If there is any contract that prevent or restrict marriage in whatever way, such contract would be considered null and void because it is against the public policy.
Despite the above, contracts will be generally considered valid when they place reasonable restrictions on marriage. In this question, the restriction placed on Betty that she should get married until after her 22nd birthday is reasonable and has to be considered to be valid. Based on this, Betty has to be paid the $25,000 as laid down in the binding contract between the two parties.
Therefore, Jim is not correct.
Answer:
Option "C" is correct.
Explanation:
An increase in government expenditure causes more money inflow on demand over supply.
A. After cutting wages and benefits in order to increase profit
Explanation:
As a company that exists in an environment, it has a responsibility to socially responsible for its actions that affect its environment including individuals(employees)
The employees are part of the social environment, so cutting their wages and benefits does not make the company socially responsible.
#learnwithbrainly
Answer:
$209
Explanation:
Since Mary's estimated annual income taxes are $5,424, then to determine the amount that should be withheld every two weeks, all we need to do is divide her total estimated taxes by 26 weeks = $5,424 / 26 weeks = $208.62 ≈ $209. generally you do not include cents in tax filings or payments, you need to round up or down. In this case you need to round up, even software rounds the amounts to the nearest dollar.
