Answer:
The religious organisations needs to work alongside Government and strict associations, to help the networks influenced by human rights violation. They likewise power the Government to make essential move.
The religious organisations needs to work alongside Government and strict associations, to help the networks influenced by human rights violation. They likewise power the Government to make essential move. The communities work on both profit and non-profit work in case of human rights violation. They also force the Government to take necessary action. Government institutions and communities work to stop human rights violations, by working on policies and legalization.
The religious organisations needs to work alongside Government and strict associations, to help the networks influenced by human rights violation. They likewise power the Government to make essential move. The communities work on both profit and non-profit work in case of human rights violation. They also force the Government to take necessary action. Government institutions and communities work to stop human rights violations, by working on policies and legalization.Religious texts and teachings can help survivors find safety, and the community offered by religious tradition can give support and counsel. On the other hand, these religious texts, teachings, and communities can also be used to condone or excuse abusive behavior.
Explanation:
Hope it help
Answer:
The correct answer is 2. Representational art.
Explanation:
As the name states, representational art refers to an art which clearly portrays or shows something which does exit in real life. When one looks at this type of art, he/she can clearly identify the object being portrayed, <em>even if its appearance is slightly altered. </em>
The following image is an example of representational art; even if the fruit is slightly altered, we can still identify it as fruit.
Answer:
B The ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest and does not unreasonably limit alternative channels of communication.
Explanation:
The court will base its decision on its determination that the ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest and does not unreasonably limit alternative channels of communication. While the First Amendment protects the freedoms of speech and assembly, the government may reasonably regulate speech-related conduct in public forums through content‑neutral time, place, and manner regulation. Here, the ban on camping overnight in the park, a content-neutral regulation of a public forum, would be evaluated by the court based on if the ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest and does not unreasonably limit alternative channels of communication. In this scenario, the question would be if the ban on the use of the park will limit alternative channels of communicating the message of the scout leader and if yes the ban may be lifted and if not, it will not be lifted.
