With his parents, Joel was employing the door-in-the-face compliance technique.
A compliance tactic that is frequently researched in social psychology is the door-in-the-face approach. The persuader makes a sizable request that the respondent will probably reject in an effort to get them to agree, kind of like metaphorically slamming a door in the persuader's face.
In the door-in-the-face method, compliance is improved by making an incredibly difficult request first, followed by a target request that is genuinely wanted.
An illustration of this would be if you refused a friend's request to borrow an excessive amount of money, only for them to later ask for a lower amount and receive your approval. The door-in-the-face tactic is frequently employed to get individuals to make a financial contribution.
To learn more about door-in-the-face technique
brainly.com/question/29380131
#SPJ4
Answer: Panic disorder along with Agoraphobia
Explanation:
Panic disorder doesn't refer to a single panic attack for someone to have panic disorder they must experience frequent panic attacks.
Agoraphobia occurs when someone is anxious of being around places where they feel trapped. Having a once off panic attack can not be classified as panic disorder , however when a person have repeating episodes of panic attacks that is a sign of having panic disorder.Panic attack and agoraphobia doesn't always go together, Some people may have one without the other.
Symptoms of panic disorder include:
- Reccuring and unexpected panic attacks
- constant anxiety about having a panic attack for a month after having had one.
- losing control
Symptoms of agoraphobia
- This is a fear associate with feeling trapped in an open space but still feel like you can't escape it.
- This involves things like being in in an enclosed space like a small shop or theatre
- One space like a shopping mall or car park
- Public transport such a a bus or plane or train
Or anywhere other than your own home.
Early theorists such as Spearman argued that GENERAL INTELLIGENCE represented basic intelligence.
According to these theorists, individuals high in GENERAL INTELLIGENCE probably excel at ALL COGNITIVE TASKS.
The defendant is not liable even if the plaintiff provides all the elements of negligence.
