Answer:
$80,000
Step-by-step explanation:
Under a Comparative negligence theory, people involved in an accident are entitled to compensation according to their contributions towards the accident. In this case, Annette contributed 20% to the collision and, thus, should receive 100% - 20% of her total loss determined by the jury. Annette should be awarded:
Therefore, the jury should award Annette $80,000
Answer:
The angle between [A_F] and the base of the cone = 68.2°
The area of the base of the cone ≈ 12.57 m²
Step-by-step explanation:
The given parameters are;
The height of the cone = 5 m
The base radius of the cone = 2 m
The angle which the AC = 120°
Therefore, we have;
The angle between [A_F] and the base of the cone = The angle between [CF] and the base of the cone
The angle between [CF] and the base of the cone = tan⁻¹(5/2) = tan⁻¹(2.5) ≈ 68.2°
∴ The angle between [A_F] and the base of the cone = The angle between [CF] and the base of the cone = 68.2°
The angle between [A_F] and the base of the cone = 68.2°
The area of the base of the cone = π × r² = π × 2² = 4·π ≈ 12.57
The area of the base of the cone ≈ 12.57 m².