Answer:
There are many problems in agriculture sector some of them are as follows:
Explanation:
1: Not gaining appropriate output after harvesting .
2: Lack of influence .
3: Limitations of new technologies .
As there are problems there are also definitely it's solutions .Some of them are as follows:
1: Providinng loan for farmers in low interest.
2: influencing farmers for agriculture .
3: Providing them new technologies in low cost .
Answer:
e. $3,892,587.08
Explanation:
The value of Nabor Industries entire company using the free cash flows can be determined by calculating the present value of all free cash flows that will be occurred in the future in the following manner:
Present value of 2004 free cash flow $176,991.15
200,000(1+13%)^-1
Present value of 2005 free cash flow $234,944
300,000(1+13%)^-2
Present value of 2006 free cash flow $277,220.06
400,000(1+13%)^-3
Present value of cash flows after 2006 $3,203,431.86
((400,000(1+4%))/(13%-4%))*(1+13%)^-3
Value of Nabor Corporation $3,892,587.07
So based on the above calculations, our answer is e. $3,892,587.08
Answer:
the utilitarian theory of ethics in business contexts.
Explanation:
According to the Utilitarian theory of ethics, the steps to be chosen by any business of entity should rely on maximizing the good and minimizing the sufferings. Also, at the same time, the benefit or good to the maximum is required to be considered before taking any decision.
In the given excerpt, Hailey adopts the utilitarian theory of ethics by focusing on the outcome of the steps that he take.
Answer: Prior period adjustment resulting from the correction of an error.
Explanation:
The Cash basis method is not acceptable under both IFRS and U.S. GAAP accounting principles and these are the principles followed by the majority of the world so Lore Co. was using the cash basis in violation of both conventions which means that their accounting records before the change are considered wrong and full of errors.
In changing to the acceptable principles, they are correcting that error and need to adjust prior periods for that error as well.
Answer:
Favorable for price and unfavorable for usage.
Explanation:
Provided Information,
Standard Material = 2.2 pounds per unit
Standard cost = $2 per pound
Actual Quantity = 2.3 pounds per unit
Actual cost = $1.95 per pound
In Material Price variance we have = (Standard Price - Actual Price) 
Actual Quantity
Since Standard Price $2 is more than actual price = $1.95 the variance is favorable.
In material quantity variance we have = (Standard Quantity - Actual Quantity) Standard Rate
Since actual quantity used = 2.3 pounds is more than standard 2.2 pounds the variance will be unfavorable
Therefore, Price Variance = Favorable, and Quantity Variance = Unfavorable.
