Ford's mass production method on a moving line was called a assembly line.
hope this helps
Answer:
![\boxed {\tt A. \ The \ Germans \ established \ a \ colony \ in \ Brazil}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cboxed%20%7B%5Ctt%20A.%20%5C%20The%20%5C%20Germans%20%5C%20established%20%5C%20a%20%5C%20colony%20%5C%20in%20%5C%20Brazil%7D)
Explanation:
Let's examine the answer choices. Remember, we are looking for the example that <u>does not </u>demonstrate strategic motivation.
A. This choice does not demonstrate any motivation. All it tells us is the Germans made a Brazilian colony.
B. This demonstrates strategic motivation. They wanted to protect the trade routes.
C. This also shows strategic motivation. The British wanted Egypt for a canal.
D. This choice also shows strategic motivation. The US became involved in Central America to oust a dictator.
Therefore, the correct answer must be A. The Germans established a colony in Brazil.
The result of the American occupation in Japan results in both countries becoming major allies and trading partners. The Americans reformed the whole of Japan by providing aid and even taught the Japanese on the proper political structure. In addition, the US played a huge role in Japan's "miracle economy" during the 1950's.
I would say alliances and nationalism because nationalism only encouraged countries to go to war and prove that they were the best most powerful country around and in terms of WWI, nationalism led to strong dedication to the army and just keep most countries in the war longer than they should have been in it. Alliances were significant in the exact beginning of the war and the scale to which the war was fought. The many (secret) alliances led to austria-hungary and Serbia to sorta threaten each other, which brought Germany in, then France, etc.
On the issue of creating a national bank, Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson and Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton differed on whether or not the bank should exist at all.