Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
a. Account receivable and sales are understated.
Adjusting entry :
Accounts Receivable (Dr.) $21,000
Sales Revenue (Cr.) $21,000
b. Interest receivable is understated.
Adjusting Entry :
Interest Receivable (Dr.) $470
Interest Earned (Cr.) $470
c. Account receivable and sales are understated.
Adjusting entry :
Accounts Receivable (Dr.) $1,460
Sales Revenue (Cr.) $1,460
Explanation:
Adjusting entries will be created for the transactions that are not properly recorded or either completely not recorded. In the given case the customer is not billed for the services rendered. This has an impact on the asset account of the company because account receivable are understated.
Interest on purchase consideration, the salary of partners, and interest on vendor capital are to be charged during the pre-incorporation period.
