1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nignag [31]
3 years ago
6

How does Douglass use the Rhetorical Appeals (Ethos, Pathos, Logos)? Look specifically in chapter 10.

English
1 answer:
natima [27]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Pathos: emotional appeal

Logos: logical appeal

Ethos: Connection between pathos and logos to cause credibility.

Explanation:

In chapter 10 Douglas establishes a connection with the reader through the use of emotions implicit in the pathos appeal proposed by the philosopher Aristotle.

According to this literary style used by the author, it is possible to establish a connection that leads the reader to understand the process of transition between the slave man to the free man, this process takes place during a situation that uses the logos appeal in its logic for its development, and it is this connection that presents credibility between the writer and his audience, that is to say the Ethos.

His main idea was to persuade the audience of the atrocities of slavery and that it should be abolished, so through his language eloquently paints a scenario that connects the emotions of the reader taking it to the persuasion of his main idea.

You might be interested in
The word commend is a verb that means “to praise formally or officially.” The addition of the suffix -tion changes the part of s
hram777 [196]

Answer: I would define commendations simply as “praise” and it would be a noun. Breaking down commendations into “commend” and “tion” allows me to see the definition of the root and then be able to apply the rule of the suffix, in this case, being that it forms nouns of action.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
ASAP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF DONE CORRECTLY : Please write a short essay on The Mystery of Three Quarters by Sophie Hannah (pl
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

<em>‘The world’s most beloved detective, Hercule Poirot – the legendary star of Agatha Christie’s Murder on the Orient Express and most recently The Monogram Murders and Closed Casket—returns in a stylish, diabolically clever mystery set in 1930’s London.’</em>

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

Who hasn’t heard of Hercules Poirot? Who hasn’t read a book by Agatha Christie? Not too many I would think. Agatha Christie is a household name due to her popularity as a writer and particularly a writer of crime fiction. Her characters are well known to all, with the fabulous Hercules Poirot a favourite of many. With his rather distinctive demeanor and quirky eccentricities, Hercules Poirot was brought to the screen by the wonderful actor David Suchet from 1989 to 2013, making him a familiar face in our living rooms. In 2014, crime-fiction writer Sophie Hannah picked up the baton and re-introduced us to Poirot with her novel The Monogram Murders, followed in 2016 by Closed Casket, both receiving much praise across the board. Taking up the pen of a phenomenally successful writer is always going to be a difficult job with criticisms bound to be cast on the writing. Is this a true Poirot mystery? Can Sophie Hannah fulfill the expectations of the true blue Christie fan? Well I guess that’s up to you, the reader, to decide. It might just be the perfect introduction, for those who may not wish to pick up a classic, to this idiosyncratic of characters.

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

The Sunday Telegraph says ‘What Sophie and Agatha have in common is a rare talent for fiendish unpredictability. They make you see how the impossible might be possible after all’.

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

In The Mystery of Three Quarters, Poirot is unexpectedly verbally assaulted on his doorstep by a woman, Sylvia Rule. She has received a letter that is signed by Hercules Poirot and in this letter she has been accused of murder!! Barnabas Pandy, a man of considerable wealth and a man she had never heard of had died. Now the cause of his death was under suspicion and apparently Poirot had written and signed this letter. Poirot, astonished, rightfully denies any knowledge of this letter or of Barnabas Pandy for that matter, but Sylvia Rule will hear none of this and is infuriated by this allegation.

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

In the following days, Poirot receives calls from three further individuals all with the same letter and all accusing Poirot of false recriminations against their good names. All claim their innocence in this matter of murder and all are justifiably angered.

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

It is now up to Poirot to get to the bottom of this mystery and discover the truth behind the death of Barnabas Pandy. Was he murdered or is this a personal vendetta and why?

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

Hercules Poirot sets off to discover the truth with the assistance of his friend and confidante, Inspector Edward Catchpool from Scotland Yard. Together they attempt to solve the case of the unidentified scribe and, in typical Christie style, we are introduced to a superb cast of characters.

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

It is quite easy to imagine the scenes as Poirot sweeps in and out, like an actor walking on and off the stage. It is a performance that is thoroughly enjoyable as each character has a unique and distinguishable persona, providing the ingredients for a wonderful and ‘diabolically clever’ mystery.

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

The Mystery of Three Quarters is a very different read to the current crop of crime novels on the shelves. There is no extreme violence, there is scant blood and there is no great chase across a continent. It is an old-fashioned, cosy mystery, making it a the perfect book to snuggle down by the fire this Winter under a blanket with a steaming mug of hot chocolate (and, if you have one….your dog by your feet!).

<em>&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---&***__()---</em>

<h2>HOPE I HELPED <3</h2>

8 0
3 years ago
40 Points this assignment, you will write an evaluation of “Is the World Falling Apart?” Reread the text. Then, read and answer
lana66690 [7]

Answer:

In Things Fall Apart and in his later novels, <em>Achebe wanted to counter demeaning and incorrect stereotypes of his people and Eurocentric presentations of the confrontation between the Ibo of Nigeria and the British intruders</em>. In his novels, Achebe admits, <em><u>he strives for artistic excellence but also wants to give a message</u></em>. Just as the oral tradition of the Ibo people served their society by sustaining its values, so the modern Ibo, writing in English, should serve Ibo society.

The author's claim is that media reports on violence and mayhem lead people to think the world is getting worse.

Explanation:

You may write your own evaluation with this information in your own words and such. I hope this helps in any way.

8 0
3 years ago
PLZZ HELPPPPP ASAP!!!!!
Sauron [17]
The second one! Hope it works lol
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following transitional words or phrases should not be used to summarize? a. Briefly c. Summing up b. Overall d. On
STALIN [3.7K]

The word "On the other hand", should not be used to summarize. Therefore, Option D is the correct statement as it is throwing light on some new information that is being used for comparison.

<h3>What do you mean by transitional words?</h3>

A transition or linking phrase is a phrase or word that suggests the connection among paragraphs or sections of textual content or speech.

Transitions offer more concord via way of means of making it greater specific or signaling how thoughts relate to one another.

Therefore, Option D is the correct statement as it is throwing light on some new information that is being used for comparison.

learn more about transitional words:

brainly.com/question/985345

#SPJ1

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In this excerpt, Eliezer observes the reaction of the Jews who are about to be deported from the ghetto after spending hours out
    6·1 answer
  • (1) Brenda would have liked to have taken her vacation at the beach. (2) However, the weather forecast on
    10·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from The Crisis, Number I by Thomas Paine. “Not all the treasures of the world, so far as I believe, could have
    13·2 answers
  • I need and opinion. Is there anything I should change? Do you like it? Is it bad?
    6·1 answer
  • Bike riding is a good way to get around town. A recent survey shows that 71% of people would like to bike more often than
    11·1 answer
  • When approaching a challenging text, it is important to do what while reading?
    11·2 answers
  • 1) Which is the odd one out in each set?
    11·1 answer
  • What do you think the Canadian government should do in order to honour treaty rights?
    12·1 answer
  • Read the following passage: "A new kind of pie, called slab pie, is taking over summer dessert tables. Nothing showcases the bri
    15·2 answers
  • Which idea does Chisholm emphasize with her use of anaphora?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!