Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
bjsjbkj is muisjm isu auisbm buis iusa uisb sui ausius suasu su usma usus usausus ususinuhsshsu u su su suususujsusubsubs busbusus su susbu susu su susbu sub su su us us u u us u aubs aubs ua us auud snud .sus m ;usndiu smudiiiiiii msuidb smuid smiusd smkiudbsiud bsiudb siu basdu
poda lusu koothi
Answer:
x = 8*root3
y = 16
Step-by-step explanation:
You can use tangent and cosine of 60° to find x and y, BUT THERE'S A SHORTCUT. You pointed out that its a 30°-60°-90° triangle. That is a special right triangle. Here's the shortcut:
the longest side (hypotenuse) is double the shortest side. We have an 8 on the shortest side, so the hypotenuse (longest side) is 16. This ALWAYS works for 30°-60°-90° triangles!
Another shortcut:
The longer leg is the shorter leg × root3.
This ALWAYS works on 30°-60°-90° triangles.
So on your triangle, the short side is 8, that means the longer leg is 8×root3.
ta-daaaa!
Answer:
5 candies
Step-by-step explanation:
Total of candy Sarah has = 25candies
If Sarah gave 2/5 of the candies to her sister, the total amount she gave her sister will be 2/5 of 25
2/5 of 25 = 10
The remaining candy left will be 25-10 which is 15.
If she gave 2/3 of amount left to her friend, the amount she gave her friend will be 2/3×15 = 10candies.
The amount of candy Sarah have left will be 15- 10 which is 5candies.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
A suitable table or calculator is needed.
One standard deviation from the mean includes 68.27% of the total, so the number of bottles in the range 20 ± 0.16 ounces will be ...
0.6827·26,000 = 17,750 . . . . . within 20 ± 0.16
__
The number below 1.5 standard deviations below the mean is about 6.68%, so for the given sample size is expected to be ...
0.66799·26,000 = 1737 . . . . . below 19.76
_____
<em>Comment on the first number</em>
The "empirical rule" tells you that 68% of the population is within 1 standard deviation (0.16 ounces) of the mean. When the number involved is expected to be expressed to 5 significant digits, your probability value needs better accuracy than that. To 6 digits, the value is 0.682689, which gives the same "rounded to the nearest integer" value as the one shown above.
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
There is definetly a whole number so thats correct
1. subtract 4 from 6 equals 2
2. turn that 4 to a 1 whole and leave what's alone
3. Look at what you did... 1 2/4
4. Take pride
