Answer:
The answer is A) relative motion.
Explanation:
As the name suggests, relative motion refers to the perceived velocity of a point in relation to another.
Some more instances would be the perceived velocity of a car if you're standing the next to the road (the car moves fast), if you're driving a car and moving at the same speed (the other car appears static) or if you're driving the opposite direction (the other car appars to move at double the speed).
It's important to notice that relative motion can be positve or negative.
Answer:
age cohort
Explanation:
The term that is being described in this question is known as an age cohort. To put it in other words this term refers to a group of individuals that were born around the same time period and are from a particular population that has typically shared certain events and experiences over the course of their lives. These events and experiences may be world events that happened during that time period of localized events due to being part of the same population.
Protect your valuables in case something drastic happens. For instance, one of my neighbors died unexpectedly at 51. Because he had a large life insurance claim, the family is okay financially.
Answer: it’s a very complex and hard system but the US uses this system because if something goes through it people on both sides can agree or disagree with something and if they do it’s passed on to another system within the federal chain hope this answers you’re question!
Explanation:
Answer: A. The statute burdens foreign commerce
Explanation:
The options are:
A. The statute burdens foreign commerce.
B. The statute violates equal protection guarantees because it is not rational to prohibit the sale of foreign beef but not foreign leather.
C. The statute substantially interferes with the vendor's right to earn a living under the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
D. The statute constitutes a taking without due process of law.
From the question, we are informed that a cattle-producing state adopted a statute that requires any food service business operating in the state to serve beef raised in the United States and that a licensed hot dog vendor who worked at a football field within the state and who had been buying hot dogs made with foreign beef for the past several years calculated that switching to an all-beef hot dog made from United States beef would reduce his profits by 10%.
The vendor then hired an attorney to challenge the statute and the attorney discovered during research into the case that most of the footballs used at the football field at which the vendor worked were made of foreign leather.
Based on the above scenario, it should be noted that it is the Congress that has power to regulate foreign commerce. Hence, in this scenario, the state adopting a legislation that requires the private vendors to favor the breed served in the United States over the foreign products is outside its powers scope. Only the congress can make such decision.
