Answer:
<h3>I think this might help you</h3><h3>
Explanation:</h3><h3 />
<h3>With the flu season swiftly approaching and the H1N1 already affecting large numbers across the world, New Hampshire faces the possibility of a flu epidemic. In such an instance, what action would the state or federal government take? The possibility of a massive quarantine gets thrown around every time a flu epidemic exists, but is such an action an infringement of the rights of individuals living in a free nation? Or is the common good of preventing the spread of infection more important?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>Even the current health care debate reflects the tension between individual rights and the common good. Over the past months New Hampshire town halls have been crowded with individuals taking a side in the individual rights/common good debate. Some have expressed the view that health care initiatives are in the interest of a healthier state and nation. Others claim that compulsory health insurance impedes individuals’ right to the best health care money can buy. Can the individual rights vs. common good debate help us understand some of the ideological tension behind the current health care discussion?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>As many of these examples show, this month’s question is largely political, but it can also flow into other areas of thought. There’s the philosophical and moral question of the Donner Party; if you and five others were stranded and starving, and your only hope of getting out alive is to eat the first member who passed away, would you do it to save the rest of the group? There is the question that comes up around the disabled. Do you build special infrastructure to accommodate the few who are disabled even if that meant the cost to do this would jack up prices. Then there is the commercial/environmental side. What is more important, buying a cheaper car that fits your personal budget and your personal tastes or a more expensive and efficient auto that would help save the environment? What do you think?
</h3>
The correct answer is simple random sampling. This is
defined as a subset of the statistical population by which each member of the
subset has the a probability of being able to be equally chosen compared to
other kind of sampling.
Answer:
Correct answer is law of nature
.
Explanation:
Locke believed that all people were born free, something that Jefferson used later while drafting Declaration. He believed that no government should be above the laws of nature and that is why the only correct option in here is this one.
He totally opposed the idea of divine kings, but of course these options are not related to the answer to the question itself.
The condition of hearing a persistent or intermittent noise, when no external cause for the noise exists, is called "Tinnitus".
Tinnitus is the point at which you can hear sounds inside your head that are made by your listening ability framework, not your condition. It could be a ringing, beating or murmuring. It is more noticeable in calm territories or at evening time. It as a rule has no specific reason however can be dealt with.
Answer:
Desert plant have adapted them to extreme weather of desert due to clever mechanism.
Explanation:
Desert plants have a very active mechanism. This enables them to survive. Even though the temperature is very extreme and rain in the desert area is very less but desert plants can bear it.
So the desert will bloom forever. Like if we talk about cactus it can survive in harsh weather. Cactus can store a large amount of water inside its cells. This water does not evaporate due to the thick layer of wax.
