This is a great question with various for and against points so i shall just give you a few that come to mind.
FOR
-conditions can be below to basic living standards, which is immoral and a violation of human rights
-People wouldn't voluntarily pay money to maintain the living conditions of convicts due to the atrocities of their crime.
-Statistics support the fact 'it doesn't work' as rehabilitation is in the minority
-it does not reduce crime rate in the slightest
-corruption
AGAINST
-what is the question suggesting should happen to convicts instead?
-wrongfully convicted
apologies im running out of time, so i can write appropriate against. hope this helps though
Answer: Holmes wrote: The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.
Found: google
Answer: (give brainliest)
False
True
False
Explanation:
A license plate is the board behind and in front of your car that has letters and numbers on it.
Answer:
If they feel like they are going to get out in prison or if they think that they are about to be proven guilty. they may make a plea deal so they can get the defendants help if they know something the prosecutor needs to know for the case.
