1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natima [27]
3 years ago
7

Raymond Zukaitis was a physician practicing medicine in Douglas County, Nebraska. Aetna issued a policy of professional liabilit

y insurance to Zukaitis through its agent, the Ed Larsen Insurance Agency. The policy covered the period from August 31, 2006, through August of the following year. On August 7, 2008, Dr. Zukaitis received a written notification of a claim for malpractice that occurred on September 27, 2006. Dr. Zukaitis notified the Ed Larsen Insurance Agency immediately and forwarded the written claim to them. The claim was then mistakenly referred to St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, the company that currently insured Dr. Zukaitis. Apparently without notice to Dr. Zukaitis, the agency contract between Larsen and Aetna had been canceled on August 1, 2007, and St. Paul had replaced Aetna as the insurancecarrier. However, when St. Paul discovered it was not the carrier on the date of the alleged wrongdoing, it notified Aetna and withdrew from Dr. Zukaitis's defense. Aetna also refused to represent Dr. Zukaitis, contending that it was relieved of its obligations to Dr. Z because he had not notified Aetna immediately of the claim. Dr. Z then secured his own attorney to defend against the malpractice claim and brought an action against Aetna to recover attorneys' fees and other expenses incurred in the defense. Should Dr. Z recover? Explain.
Law
1 answer:
ICE Princess25 [194]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: The physician is being sued. Insurance company should provide an attorney. If the doctor is negligent, insurance company should pay (that's why we have premiums). Dr. Z is sued, goes to agency, and notifies the agency. The agency doesn't notify Aetna in right amount of time, and also notifies the wrong company. Aetna doesn't have a liability because they were not notified in a timely manner. Larson is agent to Aetna. A principal's notice to agent=notice to principal. That's the same as notifying Aetna according to its claims procedure. This is not Dr.Z's problem. Aetna is wrong in denying coverage, and Dr.Z will succeed and not have to pay.

You might be interested in
Under the retributive system, the reason we punish is for the greater good of society.
erastova [34]
The answer is : False
5 0
3 years ago
Peacemaking criminology argues that (1)_____ is deeply rooted in the concept of(2)______
kirill115 [55]
1. violence
2. greed
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Give an example of a good service produced in the united states using the market model.
kobusy [5.1K]

Answer:

There are 4 basic market models: pure competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and pure monopoly. ... The best examples of a purely competitive market are agricultural products, such as corn, wheat, and soybeans.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information is considered.
jarptica [38.1K]

Electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information are considered economic espionage.

<h3>What is economic espionage?</h3>
  • Economic espionage includes electronic hacking and illegal trespassing to obtain a competitor's proprietary information.
  • Economic espionage is defined as the illegal or covert targeting or acquisition of sensitive financial, trade, or economic policy information; proprietary economic information; or technological information.
  • Using bribery, cyber-attacks, "dumpster diving," and wiretapping.
  • Creating seemingly innocent relationships with US companies in order to gather economic intelligence, including trade secrets.
  • President Clinton signed the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 into law.
  • It criminalizes the theft or misappropriation of trade secrets.
  • It is notable for being the first federal statute to broadly define and severely punish such misappropriation and theft.

Therefore, electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information are considered economic espionage.

Know more about economic espionage here:

brainly.com/question/28218496

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
The legislative body that created an
kompoz [17]
True hope this helps
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Powers specifically given to the states in the constitution are called
    5·2 answers
  • The Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 guarantees certain employees unpaid leave during a family medical emergency.
    8·1 answer
  • Approximately ________ women are victims of domestic violence each year.
    13·2 answers
  • Are cops the good guys?
    13·1 answer
  • Which act could be considered an acceptance of the social contract?
    15·1 answer
  • This system of government where power lies with the legislative body and the chief executive (leader) is part of
    9·1 answer
  • Supporters of the ruling class of lawyers, merchants, businessmen, and planters in the South called them while their detractors
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these is an example of the exchange principle?
    8·2 answers
  • A diplomat is someone who represents the nation in dealings with the governments of other nations. true or false
    8·1 answer
  • A _____ _____ is when the supply and demand of the market don't provide what society wants or needs.​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!