Answer:
The correct answer is: expressed in the prices of a base year.
Explanation:
Real GDP is an inflation-adjusted measure to calculate changes in economic output. It calculates the value of final goods and services produced in an economy in a year expressed in the prices of a base year.
Real GDP does not include changes in the price of products as it is calculated at constant prices.
Nominal GDP, on the other hand, is calculated on the basis of current prices. It includes changes in prices and is not inflation-adjusted. That is why real GDP is preferred over nominal GDP.
Answer:
Department Y $9000
Department Z $5000
Explanation:
Delivery expense can be calculated using the allocation and apportionment method for Y and Z.
<u>Step 1. Allocation</u>
The costs that are directly attributable to the departments would be allocated to its relevant department. Here, $1500 are the direct expenses for the deliveries for the department Y, so at the first step,
Department Y Cost = $1500
For the department Z, their are no direct expenses for the deliveries,so at the first step,
Department Z Cost = $0
<u>Step 1. Apportionment</u>
The indirect cost of $12500 ($14000 - $1500) would be apportioned among department Y and Z.
So
Department Y = $1500 + $12500 x 60% = $9000
Department Z = $12500 x 40% = $5000
Answer:
300 shares
Explanation:
Based on Family attribution rules the rules often requires that the family attribution should occur between parents, their children and grandchildren, regardless of their age.
But based on the information given in which Panda Company is owned equally by Min, her husband, Bin, her sister Xiao, and her grandson, Han in which each of them hold 100 shares in the company which means Under the family attribution rules we would excludes Min sister Xiao from the shares.
Hence, the shares of Panda stock that Min is deemed to own will be:
Min +husband Bin + her grandson Han =3 individual
100 shares ×3=300 shares
Therefore Under the family attribution rules, 300 shares of Panda stock is what Min is deemed to own
Answer:B
Explanation: everything had a code of ethics.
Answer: Antitrust law
Explanation:
The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, was a part of the United States antitrust law with the aim of adding further substance to the United States antitrust law regime.
The Clayton Act was to prevent anticompetitive practices. It was enacted in 1914 with the objective of strengthening Sherman Antitrust Act. When Sherman Act was enacted in 1890, the regulators realized that that the act had some weaknesses which made it impossible to prevent anti-competitive practices in businesses so the Clayton Act addressed the issue.