Answer:
Bush's statement captures the essence of nationalism.
Explanation:
Nationalism is an ideology based on a person's identification with his own country/nation, supporting that country's interests. The side effect of such an identification is that nationalists value their countries over other nations, groups, ideologies, and cultures. Nationalists tend to regard others as the enemy, as if their country needs their constant work and protection lest it will be attacked or surpassed by others.
President Bush's statement divides people and nations into two categories: allies and enemies. That is typical nationalist thought resulting from fear and terror. In order to defend oneself and one's country, people are capable of viewing the rest of the world as a threat.
Answer:
a unit of heredity which is transferred from a parent to offspring and is held to determine some characteristic of the offspring
Explanation:
You think some more about what happened on your way home. You realize that your colleague is but one person; who knows how many other people out there think like her? It helps to change people's racial stereotypes and attitudes, but the only way real change can come about is if our institutions and systems implement policies that promote racial equality. You suddenly feel angry. What if redlining still goes on because real estate companies are filled with people who think like your colleague? What policies exist to stop such institutionalized prejudice?
I believe the answer is: Latent content
According to Freud, Latent content refers to the hidden meaning that exists behind our dreams that caused by an effort for unconscious wish fulfillment.
He believed that latent content is the projection of our unconscious thought or desire that we often fail to realize in our real-life situation.
Answer:
The correct answer is option e. both (b=P may have to exercise judgement in D's behalf) and (c=there also exists a conflict if D has to exercise judgement in P's behalf).
Explanation:
Conflicts of interest are those situations in which the judgment of a subject, in relation to a primary interest for him or her, and the integrity of their actions, have to be unduly influenced by a secondary interest, which is often of economic or personal type. That is, a person incurs a conflict of interest when instead of complying with the right thing, he could guide his decisions or act for his own benefit or that of a third party.
Because of this definition we understand that P has a conflict of interest in excercising judment in D's behalf but if P does that there may exist a conflict. Therefore P could refrain from giving a judgment, opinion or positioning in such a situation.
