Answer:They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security, but agreement stops there. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations.The United States' use of nuclear weapons to end World War II led to a determined and soon successful effort by the Soviet Union to acquire such weapons, followed by a long-running nuclear arms race between the two superpowers. The Soviet Union conducted its first nuclear test in 1949.In 1949, the USSR tested its first atomic bomb. This led to a race between the two superpowers to amass the most powerful nuclear weapons with the most effective delivery systems. ... Tension was greatly increased as a result of the developing arms race which served to militarise both sides and bring war closer.
Explanation:
(happy to help)
A-Excluding persons from serving on a jury because of ethnicity.
Cannot be compelled to testify against oneself
One of the obligations of the federal government to the states is to ensure a republican form of government
The Supreme Court established the rule in Luther v. Borden 1 that disputes arising under this provision are political, not judicial, in nature and that "it lies with Congress to determine whether the government is the established one in a State... as well as its republican character."
In Texas v. White 3, it was decided that the President's decision to establish temporary governments after the war was justified, if at all, only as an exercise of his authority as Commander-in-Chief and that these governments were only to be regarded as temporary ones to carry out governmental duties while Congress considered its options.
Learn more about government here
brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ4
