1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nastasia [14]
3 years ago
15

You are offered the following gamble based on coin flips. If the first heads occurs on the first flip, you get $2. If the first

heads occurs on the second flip, you get $4, and so on, so that if the first heads is on the Nth flip, you get $2N. The game continues until there is a heads. Which of the following best represents the expected value of this gamble in dollars? e 0 π [infinity] When offered, most people say they would pay only less than $10 to play this game.
Mathematics
1 answer:
Andrews [41]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

infinity

Step-by-step explanation:

a) the expected value of this gamble in dollars is Infinity

i.e

expected value = \frac{1}{2}*2 +  \frac{1}{4}*4 +  \frac{1}{8}*8 + \frac{1}{16}*16 + ... + \to  \infty (infinty) \\

= 1+1+1+1+1 + ... = \infty

b)

When offered, most people say they would pay only less than $10 to play this game.

What are two reasons why people are willing to pay so much less than the expected value?

These people are ready to pay less than $10 to play this game due to the fact that people usually overlook the unlikely event when making decisions. In a bid to that logic, they gamble in order to double their amount of money and the probability that heads may never come is ignored by these people and they may hope for a likely event i.e a head every time they play the game.

Also, the expected value is so humongous that if and only if that the first head appears after a long series of tails which is  very less certain to occur, because mostly people would think that on an average the length of a series of tails ( or heads) is somewhat near 10 or so, but definitely infinity.

You might be interested in
A. 6x^3+18x<br> b.6x^2+3<br> c.36x^2+18<br> d. 36x^2+3
zzz [600]

<u><em>The answer:</em></u> 6x^3+18x

<u><em>The Explanation:</em></u> You need to uses distributive property to 6x to x^2+3 which will be 6x^3+18x

6 0
3 years ago
Write an equation for the following situation:<br><br> A student reads 65 pages per hour.
Snezhnost [94]
Answer: 65h
Explanation: if the student read 65 pages per house you would multiply the hours read by 65 to determine the number of pages read :)
8 0
2 years ago
Divide 1.20m in the ratio 2:3:4 in a clear way
tatuchka [14]
2:3:4 gives 9 equal parts.
1.20 divided by 9 is 0.133.

2 * 0.133 would be 0.266m
3 * 0.133 would be 0.399m
4 * 0.133 would be 0.533m

To check this calculate 0.533 + 0.399 + 0.266 would be 1.198m (close enough)
4 0
3 years ago
Suppose <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=m" id="TexFormula1" title="m" alt="m" align="absmiddle" class="latex-formula"> men and
ollegr [7]

Firstly, we'll fix the postions where the n women will be. We have n! forms to do that. So, we'll obtain a row like:

\underbrace{\underline{~~~}}_{x_2}W_2 \underbrace{\underline{~~~}}_{x_3}W_3 \underbrace{\underline{~~~}}_{x_4}... \underbrace{\underline{~~~}}_{x_n}W_n \underbrace{\underline{~~~}}_{x_{n+1}}

The n+1 spaces represented by the underline positions will receive the men of the row. Then,

x_1+x_2+x_3+...+x_{n-1}+x_n+x_{n+1}=m~~~(i)

Since there is no women sitting together, we must write that x_2,x_3,...,x_{n-1},x_n\ge1. It guarantees that there is at least one man between two consecutive women. We'll do some substitutions:

\begin{cases}x_2=x_2'+1\\x_3=x_3'+1\\...\\x_{n-1}=x_{n-1}'+1\\x_n=x_n'+1\end{cases}

The equation (i) can be rewritten as:

x_1+x_2+x_3+...+x_{n-1}+x_n+x_{n+1}=m\\\\&#10;x_1+(x_2'+1)+(x_3'+1)+...+(x_{n-1}'+1)+x_n+x_{n+1}=m\\\\&#10;x_1+x_2'+x_3'+...+x_{n-1}'+x_n+x_{n+1}=m-(n-1)\\\\&#10;x_1+x_2'+x_3'+...+x_{n-1}'+x_n+x_{n+1}=m-n+1~~~(ii)

We obtained a linear problem of non-negative integer solutions in (ii). The number of solutions to this type of problem are known: \dfrac{[(n)+(m-n+1)]!}{(n)!(m-n+1)!}=\dfrac{(m+1)!}{n!(m-n+1)!}

[I can write the proof if you want]

Now, we just have to calculate the number of forms to permute the men that are dispposed in the row: m!

Multiplying all results:

n!\times\dfrac{(m+1)!}{n!(m-n+1)!}\times m!\\\\&#10;\boxed{\boxed{\dfrac{m!(m+1)!}{(m-n+1)!}}}

4 0
3 years ago
45,621 round to the nearest thousand?
yaroslaw [1]

Answer: 46,000

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The figure below shows costs for a current home mortgage versus a refinanced home mortgage. Refinancing has initial costs, but r
    6·1 answer
  • Which are equivalent to 3^2 x 3^4? check all that apply.
    13·1 answer
  • -8g-13=43<br><br>84-x=27<br><br>how do I solve these?
    6·1 answer
  • Need help presenting this solution on and number line and in interval notation. (I’m absolutely clueless haha)
    14·1 answer
  • Please help for brainliest!! <br> 45 POINTS !!
    8·2 answers
  • Express the given product as a sum or difference containing only sines or cosines.
    10·1 answer
  • Please Help Me With This!! I'd Appreciate It So Much!!
    15·2 answers
  • The angle measurements in the diagram are represented by the following expressions.
    13·2 answers
  • Astrid has a data plan through her cell phone company where she pays $49 a month for 5,000 kilobytes (KB) of data and $0.037 for
    7·1 answer
  • How many solutions exist for the system of equations graphed below? 3 2 54 -3 -2 -1 1 1​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!