1. The ideal is not to engage in gossip at work, not expressing opinions about colleagues and not getting involved in meetings with non-professional matters.
2- The worker must be honest with his supervisors about his commitments outside of work, seeking a joint solution to the problem with weekly overtime.
3. In order not to create a conflict over an issue that you do not want to answer at work, you should be honest and politely ask that non-professional matters not be discussed in the workplace.
<h3 /><h3>How to act ethically at work?</h3>
It is essential that the employee acts with respect for the values and individualities of other co-workers, adopting an honest and cordial attitude towards everyone and following the established rules of conduct.
Therefore, through ethics, an organization develops a stronger culture focused on personal development, motivation and collaboration.
Find out more about ethics here:
brainly.com/question/13383200
Answer:
Moral outrage.
Explanation:
In the case of any wrong and unfortunate event, the victims always demand and expect justice to be given to them for the pain and suffering they were made to go through. Same case for a murdered parent and the expectation of giving a just punishment to the culprit for the crime.
In wanting death for the killer, the parent's want reflects the punishment goal of moral outrage. This is an emotional reaction stemming from the injustice that has been done or given to them. The feeling that the killer deserves the punishment is, to them, a moral judgment, rightly deserved and also will give them a sense of satisfaction in knowing that their child's killer got his/ her due.
Answer:
En contraste con los pasos lineales del método científico simplificado, este proceso no es lineal: el proceso de la ciencia es iterativo. La ciencia gira sobre sí misma para que las ideas útiles se construyan y se utilicen para aprender aún más sobre el mundo natural.
Answer:
President Andrew Jackson responded to this decision by <em><u>ignoring the ruling and allowing Georgia to evict the Cherokee Nation</u></em>.
Explanation:
The 1832 Supreme Court case of Worcester v. Georgia was a result of the state of Georgia mandating the 'white' missionaries to take permission and pledge allegiance to the state before they venture into the Cherokee nation/ settlements. This would become the turning point for the removal of the native Indians from their homes later.
When the state of Georgia tried to impose laws even to the Cherokee territories, white missionaries like Samuel A. Worcester advised the Indians to oppose such actions. The Indians are an autonomous nation and were not under any obligation to be under any law imposed by the government. When the Cherokee people refused to imply with the new law, which also included the missionaries to take permission from the state government and also to pledge allegiance to the state, the case was taken to the Supreme Court.
The court also ruled in favor of Worcester and the Cherokee nation, stating that the Georgia government has no power to impose any rules over the autonomous Indian territory. It was then that President Andrew Jackson refused to comply with the ruling and allowed Georgia to continue with its attempts to 'disrupt' the Cherokee people. This will eventually lead to what will be known as the Trail of Tears, which was a major removal of the Indian people from their lands.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
