Answer:
pay a wage rate less than labor's MRP
Explanation:
A monopsonistic employer in an unorganized (nonunion) labor market will: "pay a wage rate less than labor's MRP"
The above statement is based on the idea that Monopsony is a market situation whereby a single buyer or firm is the only purchaser of a good or service, which in most cases has to do with the purchase of labor.
And given the fact that the firm is the sole purchaser of labor, where there is no labor union, there is a high tendency that such firm or employer pays a wage rate less than labor's marginal revenue productivity.
Answer:
Nico invest $2500 at 9% interest rate and $800 at 4% interest rate.
Explanation:
He invests some money at 9%, and $1700 less than that amount at 4 %.
Let Nico invest $x at 9%.
It means he invest $( x-1700) at 4%.
The investments produced a total of $257 interest in 1 yr.
Add 68 on both sides.
Divide both sides by 0.13.
Nico invest $2500 at 9% interest rate.
Nico invest $800 at 4% interest rate.
Therefore Nico invest $2500 at 9% interest rate and $800 at 4% interest rate.
Answer:
This error will decrease Howard's inventory by $6,000
Explanation:
Howard's inventory should include:
inventory on hand + goods purchased FOB shipping point + goods sold FOB destination point.
FOB shipping point means that the title of the goods is passed at the moment that they leave the seller's warehouse. FOB destination point means that the title of the goods is passed only after they have been delivered to the buyer's warehouse.
In this case, Howard purchased goods as FOB shipping point, so that means they should have been included in their inventory. Since they weren't, this error will decrease its inventory by $6,000.
Answer:
The appropriate response is "12.47%".
Explanation:
The given values are:
Borrowed amount,
= 152300
APR,
= 11.75%
i.e.,
= 0.1175
Now,
The effective annual rate will be:
= 
On substituting the given values, we get
= 
= 
= 
= 
Answer:
Answer Illustration : Opportunity Cost of producing Wine is lesser in France, Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters is lesser in Tunisia. So, France has comparative advantage in Wine, Tunisia in Sweater.
Explanation:
Opportunity Cost is the cost of next best alternative foregone while choosing an alternative.
Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters & Wine in France & Tunisia are quantities of other goods (Sweaters or Tunias) sacrifised while choosing either. Sweater Opportunity Cost - Wines sacrifised, Wine Opportunity Cost - Sweaters sacrifised.
The country has a comparative advantage in a good if it can produce it with relatively less opportunity cost (in terms of other good sacrifised) than other country.
Ex : Production Possibilities
Wine Sweater Trade off (Wine :Sweater)
France 10 5 1:0.5 or 2:1
Tunisia 8 24 1:3 or 0.33:1
- France produces Wine with lesser opportunity cost (sweater sacrifised) than Tunisia [0.5 sweater < 3 sweaters] ; it has comparative advantage in Wine.
- Tunisia produces Sweater with less opportunity cost (wine sacrifised) than France [ 0.33 wine < 2 wines] ; it has comparative advantage in Tunisia
