Answer:
The answer is National Security argument
Explanation:
In this question, the woman is arguing on the basis of national security as the over-reliance on foreign countries for something as important as one used in making weapons for defense does not appeal to her. From her point of view, she does not argue from an "unfair competition" point of view, neither is she arguing because she is a little player in the industry. Her point is valid as it is a threat to national security to depend on the purchase of a very important item that is used in the manufacture of weapons for defense.
what is the difference between federalism which is what would give the pres more power to do what he/she wants and anti-federalism is what gives the states more power basically making them there own little countries in a bigger country, THE USA, so you have a bill that is proposed, it is sent to congress has to pass with 51% majority, then to the senate 51% majority, then sent to the pres if he vetos it then it starts over and now it needs to be 2/3 majority for both the congress and senate and if it passes them then it will pass the pres and be passed.
Answer:
I wouldn't consider our government that because they are doing the best that they can even though a bunch of other people dislike and myself we still have to be very grateful for what we have :).
Answer: I don’t know if this would help but, experience.
Explanation:
Because some people liked the service, and some people didn’t.